Florida's Trauma Drama Continues as New Law Challenged
Nicklaus Children's Hospital filed a challenge in Leon County circuit court seeking an injunction to block a section of the law that would allow a competitor, Kendall Regional Medical Center, to operate what is known as a Level I trauma center.
May 16, 2018 at 01:15 PM
4 minute read
Part of a new Florida law touted as a way to end years of disputes over trauma centers is being challenged by a Miami-based hospital.
Nicklaus Children's Hospital filed a challenge in Leon County circuit court seeking an injunction to block a section of the law that would allow a competitor, Kendall Regional Medical Center, to operate what is known as a Level I trauma center.
Nicklaus Children's Hospital “is likely to suffer irreparable harm because any final approval of Kendall's Level I status, and the significant damage flowing therefrom, cannot be undone,” attorneys for the facility wrote in the lawsuit filed Thursday.
The filing added that “given the importance of trauma centers, Florida's regulation of a unified trauma system should place the needs of trauma victims and citizens over private corporate interests.”
With Kendall upgraded to a Level I trauma center, the lawsuit contends that pediatric patients will be diverted to Kendall instead of going to Nicklaus.
The children's hospital argued that the portion of the new law is unconstitutional because the Legislature didn't follow proper procedures when passing what Nicklaus contends is a “special law” or a narrowly targeted local law that benefits Kendall Regional Medical Center.
The Constitution requires that lawmakers provide advance notice to the public before they enact a special law or that a referendum be held for local voters to weigh in on the issue.
Attorneys also maintain that the law is unconstitutional because it unfairly benefits one private corporation, which is prohibited in the state Constitution.
Kendall Regional Medical Center is owned by the Hospital Corporation of America, or HCA, and is the only hospital that qualifies as a Level I trauma center under that section of the law. The challenge contends the law “impermissibly grants a 'privilege to a private corporation' that others do not receive and is therefore a constitutionally prohibited special law.”
In May 2016, the Florida Department of Health gave Kendall, which had been operating as a Level II trauma center, provisional authority to operate as a Level I trauma center. Nicklaus, which is part of the Miami Children's Health System and has a pediatric trauma center, challenged the move that same month.
During the 2018 legislative session, Senate Health Policy Chairwoman Dana Young, R-Tampa, and other lawmakers tried to resolve long-standing disputes that have largely come as HCA has moved in recent years to open trauma centers at many of its hospitals. Among other things, the new law changed the number of trauma-service areas from 19 to 18 and put a new “need formula” in law for the approval of trauma centers. It passed the Legislature unanimously.
The provision in the law that concerns Nicklaus requires the state to provide Level I trauma status to any facility that had provisional Level I approval before January 2017 and had been operating as a Level I trauma center but had not received final verification by December 2017.
The law is “a special law that allows Kendall — and only Kendall — to automatically bypass in depth review, including a determination of need, and to receive the department's final approval as a Level I trauma center without meeting the same requirements and standards, and undergoing the same approval process, as other hospitals,” the suit alleges.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250