Legal Rights in Sugar Valley: Cuban Software Copyrights
Americans who have traveled to Cuba, have seen a beautiful country with crumbling buildings, unreliable electrical power and hard-to-access internet.
May 17, 2018 at 10:16 AM
5 minute read
Americans who have traveled to Cuba, have seen a beautiful country with crumbling buildings, unreliable electrical power and hard-to-access internet. However, they have also met the creative, dynamic and resourceful Cuban people. It therefore does not come as a surprise that despite the infrastructure challenges of life in the Island country, Cubans have eagerly embraced what they can of the internet. Growth in this sector has given birth to a nascent software and internet community that has been dubbed Azucar Valley (Sugar Valley).
For the most part, the internet in Cuba is accessed through mobile devices and public Wi-Fi hotspots. Outside of government or educational institutions, computers and wired internet connections are the exception rather than the norm. Internet access is normally purchased in the form of scratch-off cards of different values sold by the Empresa de Telecomunicaciones de Cuba (ETECSA). The card contains a long string of numbers that must be entered into the login page every time you want to access the internet. The speed is usually dismally slow. Despite the unwieldy and inconvenient way in which internet access is obtained on the island, it is not unusual to be walking on the streets of Havana and suddenly find yourself surrounded by hundreds of people intently tapping away on their phones.
Cubans are so eager to join the digital revolution, that they have developed their own series of mini-internets. A series of networks have been created throughout the island by young individuals running servers, high speed cables and repeaters between the rooftops and windows of the city. The networks, generally known as Street Net or Snet, are tolerated by the authorities and are used to network games and pirated content.
For over a dozen years, Cuban universities and public institutions have developed software for the Cuban market. In the last few years, Cuba's first independently developed video game has begun to draw attention. Not only does the game show a significant amount of creativity, mixing in local religious and cultural iconography, but it also shows the ability of Cubans to privately develop and fund complex software projects. Because of the private nature of the development model, it is one that might obtain U.S. government approval for future work on the island.
So what laws are there to protect software on in Cuba? In the United States, copyrights are often used to protect software code. The Cuban law of copyrights, Law 14, which was enacted in 1977, does not mention software copyrights. Software copyrights were added to the law in 1991, by Joint Resolution 1 of the Ministries of Culture and Heavy Machinery. The law extends protection to databases and software programs, subsequent versions and derivative works, regardless of medium. The copyright lasts for 50 years from publication—or from creation if it is never published. It is also limited to the code and not the concept, ideas or mathematical formulas expressed in the code.
As in the case of Law 14, Resolution 1 divides rights into three types. Those applicable to independent creations, those applicable to works made for hire and those applicable to works made in the context of employment. These three rights, in turn, consist of combinations of three other rights: the right to exploit, moral rights and title rights.
The independent creator of a work has the right to contract for its exploitation, to be identified with the work and to control other rights to the work. The right of a creator of a work made for hire will depend on the contract governing the creation. The copyright and right of exploitation to a work made by an employee belongs to the employer. In a work made for hire, the creator will be entitled to at least 10 percent of earnings made from the work. In the case of a work made by an employee, his salary is deemed sufficient compensation.
As in the case of other creative works under law 14, a copyright need not be registered to be protected. However, registration with the National Copyright Registry provides certain presumptive advantages as to authorship and date of creation in the event of a dispute.
While this law has created a framework for extending copyrights to software, copyrights in Cuba have not kept up with technological changes. One major gap is the absence of an anti-counterfeiting law at either the civil or criminal level. Another that had been a major topic of discussion in recent years is the lack of a mechanism for recognizing and enforcing open source licenses in Cuba.
The new president of Cuba, Miguel Diaz-Canel, was educated as an electrical engineer and is familiar with the technology and its potential. He has stated that he is committed to making digital access to government and medical information. However, he has also expressed suspicion and hostility to what he called “pseudo-cultural, banal and vulgar content on the internet.” One would expect political dissent to be concealed in that description and that the government will pursue control of the web as other communist countries have done.
Jorge Espinosa is the managing partner with the Miami intellectual property boutique law firm of Espinosa Martinez. He focuses his practice on the domestic and international protection of trademarks, patents and copyrights. He may be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 2Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 3Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 43rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 5Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250