Judge Asked to Settle Regulatory Dispute Over 'Dry Needling'
In a challenge filed this week, the Florida State Oriental Medical Association is asking a state administrative judge to block a proposed rule that would allow certain physical therapists to begin “dry needling.”
May 18, 2018 at 12:17 PM
3 minute read
A regulatory fight between acupuncturists and physical therapists over “dry needling” will be hammered out by a state judge.
In a challenge filed this week, the Florida State Oriental Medical Association is asking a state administrative judge to block a proposed rule that would allow certain physical therapists to begin “dry needling.”
“Dry needling” is a term physical therapists use to describe the technique of inserting filiform needles into the skin at various “trigger points,” which causes certain responses.
In a 15-page filing with the Division of Administrative Hearings, attorneys for the oriental medical association argue that “dry needling is acupuncture by another name” and allege that the rule proposed by the Florida Board of Physical Therapy oversteps the board's authority.
Current law allows physical therapists to practice acupuncture only “when no penetration of the skin occurs,” lawyers for the oriental medical association argued. The proposed rule “expands the legal scope of practice of physical therapy to a scope that is illegal under the statute,” they alleged.
“Physical therapists who practice so-called 'dry needling'… but who are not licensed to practice acupuncture by the Board of Acupuncture in this state present a danger to the public in Florida and should be prohibited” from the practice, the lawyers wrote.
The Florida Physical Therapy Association, meanwhile, supports the rule, which would allow licensed physical therapists to offer dry needling if they have completed certain training, including an in-person examination of skills related to dry needling.
In correspondence to the Board of Physical Therapy, attorneys for the group said that dry needling doesn't expand a physical therapist's scope of practice because therapists are authorized to use apparatuses and equipment on their patients which, they argue, includes needles.
The Board of Physical Therapy proposed the rule in February, after issuing a declaratory statement last summer proclaiming that dry needling falls within a physical therapist's scope of practice.
The board also gave Rob Stanborough, a St. Augustine physical therapist and owner of First Coast Rehabilitation, authority to begin offering dry-needling services.
Stanborough, who also teaches dry-needling techniques for the Myopain Seminars company, is the only physical therapist in the state who has been authorized to perform the procedure.
But the acupuncturists' association maintains the proposed rule “will allow parties unlicensed to practice acupuncture that penetrates the skin to, in fact, practice acupuncture that penetrates the skin, thereby taking patients in need of acupuncture and desiring acupuncture away from licensed acupuncturists.”
Christine Sexton reports for News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250