Suit Over Florida Gun Laws Gains Momentum as 20 Cities, 61 Politicians Join Action
The suit comes in the wake of two Florida mass shootings that drew international attention and sparked debates about gun-control and Second Amendment ownership rights.
May 18, 2018 at 02:38 PM
3 minute read
A lawsuit against Florida state officials aimed at removing roadblocks that stop local governments implementing their own gun laws is gaining momentum.
Twenty municipalities and 61 elected officials have now joined the litigation as plaintiffs against the state government, Gov. Rick Scott, Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Commissioner Adam Putnam, state Department of Law Enforcement Commissioner Rick Swearingen, Auditor General Sherrill Norman and Florida's Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis.
Their suit comes in the wake of two Florida mass shootings that drew global attention and sparked debates about gun-control and ownership rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It follows the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland that left 17 dead, and the June 2016 massacre at Orlando's Pulse nightclub, where a gunman killed 49 people.
“Municipalities and elected officials from across the state—in urban, suburban and rural communities—have all joined the fight to protect the home rule authority of local governments, and to reflect the passion of their residents,” said lead attorney Jamie Cole, managing director of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman.
“The state system is one-size-fits-all. The same rules apply in an urban area like downtown Miami, a suburban area like Weston and an agricultural area like Central Florida,” he added. “We think that that residents in their own community should be able to have stricter rules regarding firearms within constitutional bounds, if they believe the conditions in their city justify such rules.”
The state Attorney General;s office, which is defending the lawsuit, declined comment, citing a policy that prevents commenting on ongoing litigation.
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to an April suit by 10 South Florida cities: Weston, Miramar, Pompano Beach, Pinecrest, South Miami, Miami Gardens, Miami Beach, Coral Gables, Cutler Bay and Lauderhill. They initially included 31 elected officials. Their plaintiff list has since doubled, with Boca Raton, Surfside, Tallahassee, North Miami, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Gainesville, St. Petersburg, Maitland and Key Biscayne signing on to the complaint filed in Leon Circuit Court. Another 30 politicians also joined the fray.
The plainitffs hope to persuade the court to invalidate a slew of penalties provided under state law to punish local government officials who pass local gun regulations.
Florida's legislature enacted provisions in 2011 that remove elected officials from office without a hearing, fine them up to $5,000, and allows unlimited lawsuits against municipalities by plaintiffs who claim local gun regulations impinge on their constitutional rights.
““The law, with all these penalties, has effectively chilled elected officials from taking any action on firearms,” Cole said. ”This is a unique and unprecedented act to remove from office and penalize local officials, just because they vote a certain way.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readMiami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
3 minute readMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250