Innovative Practice Group
Two technology-based practice areas — surrogacy and cryptocurrency fraud — are the basis for unique legal work at two South Florida law firms.
May 21, 2018 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
GREENSPOON MARDER
Surrogacy Marla Neufeld developed the concept of third-party assisted reproductive technology as a practice area through personal experience. The Greenspoon Marder partner struggled with infertility for four years and found she wasn't alone. About 12 percent of married women of childbearing age have fertility problems. Neufeld ended up using a gestational surrogate to start her family and became the mother of twins in 2014. She realized the breadth of the legal issues surrounding surrogacy along the way. The niche practice in her firm's marital and family law department focuses on helping couples create their own families by advising them on reproductive technologies and adoption laws in Florida and assisting in areas such as surrogacy and egg, sperm and embryo donations. Drawing from her personal experience, the Fort Lauderdale attorney combines her real estate transactional law background with her compassion and understanding of the surrogacy and adoption process. Legal service options include representation on behalf of surrogates and intended parents interested in using a surrogate; egg and sperm donation agreements; and adoptions by heterosexual and same-sex couples, stepparents and second parents. Neufeld is the co-author of the American Bar Association's "Consumer Guide to Assisted Reproduction: Techniques, Legal Issues and Pathways to Success." The book draws on her personal journey and applies her law background to create a simple guide to assisted reproductive technology. In the book, she explains the available ART options, the process for choosing a medical provider and legal representation; understanding and signing appropriate agreements; and the unique issues that may arise before and after birth. She frequently speaks on ART topics, most recently serving as a featured speaker at a Broward County Bar's matrimonial lawyers luncheon and presenting an ART Q&A in Chicago. She is a member of the American Bar Association's Assisted Reproductive Technology Committee.
SILVER MILLER
Cryptocurrency Fraud The Coral Springs law firm co-founded by David Silver and Jason Miller launched by offering representation as securities fraud and investment loss specialists, and then they drilled down to specialize even more. Silver Miller bills itself as the leading cryptocurrency investor advocates in the nation. The four-attorney firm now has lawsuits pending against cryptocurrency exchanges and the largest initial coin offering promoters, alleging fraud, misrepresentation and securities violations. Silver Miller said it pioneered ahead-of-the-curve litigation in 2014 before bitcoin became a household name and has secured more than $11 million in settlements and judgments against cryptocurrency Ponzi schemers. The partners have filed a civil action against South Florida-based Cryptsy, once one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. The partners charge CEO Paul Vernon helped engineer a widespread fraud before the abrupt closing of the exchange and his disappearance to China with millions of dollars in account holders' funds. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit last month affirmed a decision by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach striking arbitration in the class action, setting it up for a jury trial. The firm claimed Vernon destroyed the company's computer servers when the alleged scheme collapsed, but a forensic recreation of company records helped obtain a $9 million judgment against Vernon last July plus an order requiring him to return over 11,325 bitcoins valued at more than $125 million. Silver Miller also has lawsuits pending against the Coinbase, Kraken and BitConnect exchanges and ICO promoters Tezos, Giga Watt and Monkey Capital.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Shareholders Sue Arc Global for Wrongful Withholding of Trump Media Shares
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250