Parkland Families Seek Clearance to Sue Gun Maker, Seller
Two families file a lawsuit to clarify they can sue the maker and seller of the AR-15 rifle used in the Parkland school shooting for damages without risking financial ruin.
May 24, 2018 at 01:11 PM
3 minute read
The parents of two victims of the Parkland school shooting are seeking a court order to clarify the breadth of a state law imposing heavy financial penalties on plaintiffs that sue gun makers and retailers.
The Broward Circuit Court lawsuit filed Wednesday seeks a declaratory judgment saying the victims' parents would not risk payment for stock price drops and lost company revenue under a 2001 Florida law that explicitly bars suits by public agencies against the gun industry if their products are used illegally.
“It's amazing to me to watch this culture of fear that has evolved around this industry,” Frederic Guttenberg said Thursday at a Miami news conference announcing the gateway-issue suit. His 14-year-old daughter Jaime was chased down a third-floor hallway at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School before being shot to death Feb. 14.
Podhurst Orseck attorney Stephen Rosenthal in Miami, who represents Guttenberg and his wife Jennifer, said the goal is to obtain an order saying the families do not risk financial ruin if they follow up with lawsuits for damages.
The defendants in the complaint for declaratory relief are Massachusetts-based American Outdoor Brands Corp., formerly Smith & Wesson, and Sunrise Tactical Supply LLC, the Coral Springs store that sold the AR-15 rifle used by accused shooter Nikolas Cruz.
Guttenberg is suing along with Max Schachter, whose 14-year-old son Alex died in the mass shooting. Schachter is represented by Julie Braman Kane of Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables.
“We expect the court to uphold the statute,” Kane said, meaning the judge would agree with her interpretation allowing individual lawsuits for damages.
The law in dispute bars government lawsuits against the gun industry but contains “a cryptic and confusing reference to suits by private individuals” listing an exception for individual suits over defective products, the complaint said.
“This is the only industry where there appears to be a protected class,” Guttenberg said. “We need to change the course of history as it relates to guns.” He followed up with a November election pitch to “fire those who refuse to do something.”
A separate lawsuit filed since the Parkland shooting by 20 municipalities and 61 elected officials seeks to reverse a pre-emptive state law barring lower-level public agencies from adopting gun control measures that are stricter than state law. The law opens violators to $5 million fines.
There was no immediate response to requests for comment from American Outdoor Brands. A call to Sunrise Tactical Supply reached L&M Guns & Ammo at the same address; the man who answered the phone said “ma'am” and hung up.
Other lawsuits filed by families after the school shooting left 17 people dead have named as defendants Cruz; the estate of his late mother, Lynda; a couple who let Cruz move in with them after she died; three mental health centers where Cruz was treated; and a since-fired school resource officer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250