Parkland Families Seek Clearance to Sue Gun Maker, Seller
Two families file a lawsuit to clarify they can sue the maker and seller of the AR-15 rifle used in the Parkland school shooting for damages without risking financial ruin.
May 24, 2018 at 01:11 PM
3 minute read
The parents of two victims of the Parkland school shooting are seeking a court order to clarify the breadth of a state law imposing heavy financial penalties on plaintiffs that sue gun makers and retailers.
The Broward Circuit Court lawsuit filed Wednesday seeks a declaratory judgment saying the victims' parents would not risk payment for stock price drops and lost company revenue under a 2001 Florida law that explicitly bars suits by public agencies against the gun industry if their products are used illegally.
“It's amazing to me to watch this culture of fear that has evolved around this industry,” Frederic Guttenberg said Thursday at a Miami news conference announcing the gateway-issue suit. His 14-year-old daughter Jaime was chased down a third-floor hallway at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School before being shot to death Feb. 14.
Podhurst Orseck attorney Stephen Rosenthal in Miami, who represents Guttenberg and his wife Jennifer, said the goal is to obtain an order saying the families do not risk financial ruin if they follow up with lawsuits for damages.
The defendants in the complaint for declaratory relief are Massachusetts-based American Outdoor Brands Corp., formerly Smith & Wesson, and Sunrise Tactical Supply LLC, the Coral Springs store that sold the AR-15 rifle used by accused shooter Nikolas Cruz.
Guttenberg is suing along with Max Schachter, whose 14-year-old son Alex died in the mass shooting. Schachter is represented by Julie Braman Kane of Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables.
“We expect the court to uphold the statute,” Kane said, meaning the judge would agree with her interpretation allowing individual lawsuits for damages.
The law in dispute bars government lawsuits against the gun industry but contains “a cryptic and confusing reference to suits by private individuals” listing an exception for individual suits over defective products, the complaint said.
“This is the only industry where there appears to be a protected class,” Guttenberg said. “We need to change the course of history as it relates to guns.” He followed up with a November election pitch to “fire those who refuse to do something.”
A separate lawsuit filed since the Parkland shooting by 20 municipalities and 61 elected officials seeks to reverse a pre-emptive state law barring lower-level public agencies from adopting gun control measures that are stricter than state law. The law opens violators to $5 million fines.
There was no immediate response to requests for comment from American Outdoor Brands. A call to Sunrise Tactical Supply reached L&M Guns & Ammo at the same address; the man who answered the phone said “ma'am” and hung up.
Other lawsuits filed by families after the school shooting left 17 people dead have named as defendants Cruz; the estate of his late mother, Lynda; a couple who let Cruz move in with them after she died; three mental health centers where Cruz was treated; and a since-fired school resource officer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250