Immigration Policy: Reducing the Impact on Your Foreign Construction Workforce
In the past 17 months, the Trump administration has issued far-reaching executive orders (EOs) that require the U.S. government agencies overseeing immigration to shift their focus from assisting immigrants to making it harder for them to remain in the United States.
June 14, 2018 at 10:02 AM
4 minute read
In the past 17 months, the Trump administration has issued far-reaching executive orders (EOs) that require the U.S. government agencies overseeing immigration to shift their focus from assisting immigrants to making it harder for them to remain in the United States. Although no new laws or regulations have been passed, the effects of the policy changes reflected in the EOs are real and ongoing. These changes will have a particularly significant impact on the construction industry given its historical and wide use of undocumented workers as well as foreign nationals.
|Work Visas
Changes resulting from the EOs include those related to the processing, review, and eventual issuance of work visas; and to the entry process at U.S. borders and airports. There are increased vetting procedures at both the stateside U.S. Citizenship and Immigration offices and the U.S. consulates overseas. Applications are being questioned more rigorously, and the issuance of work visas or green cards will be delayed, making it harder for foreign nationals to work in the United States legally.
|Immigration Programs
The Trump administration declared that numerous immigration programs will end in the next 12 to 18 months. These include the temporary protected status (TPS) program, which has kept foreign national workers employed in the U.S. construction industry for over 20 years. The TPS program will end for hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals from:
- Nicaragua (on Jan. 5, 2019);
- Haiti (on June 22, 2019);
- El Salvador (on Sept. 9, 2019); and
- Honduras (June 5, 2018).
The U.S. Department of Homeland (DHS) Secretary will assess conditions in Honduras to determine whether to extend, re-designate, or terminate TPS for Hondurans at least 60 days before July 5.
The Trump administration also rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, as of March 5. In response, immigrant advocate groups pursued legal actions. As a result, federal court orders have allowed DACA renewals to be filed using the same procedures that existed prior to the Trump Administration's Sept. 17, 2017 rescission announcement.
|Raids, Audits and Investigations
Arrests by the U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) increased by 30 percent in fiscal year 2017, according to a study by the Pew Research Center. Immigrant advocates and analysts attribute that jump to the wider net cast by the DHS, which is now arresting people whose only offense is breaking immigration laws. Due to the significant drop in border crossings, ICE is concentrating on interior enforcement, conducting raids, audits, and investigations at both offices and building sites, and targeting certain industries to emphasize the Trump administration's compliance message.
|Prepare Your Business, Protect Your Workforce
Employers should now take the following steps:
- Conduct internal I-9 employment verification form audits;
- Review payroll records against I-9 records;
- Review E-Verify usage to ensure compliance;
- Identify foreign national employees to determine who has employment-limited documentation; and
- Begin processing any employment authorization document (EAD) cards for DACA holders to ensure extensions.
Prepare employees for a possible raid by advising them, in a public forum, to carry identification documentation as well as a copy of their passport and green card, if applicable, to present proof of nationality. Advise them that, in the event of a raid, they need not answer any questions from ICE, and will be protected.
To alleviate workforce anxiety and prevent major disruption, educate frontline management on what to do in the event of an ICE raid. Provide them with a one-page document, “What to Do in the Event of an ICE Raid,” which could include advice to: designate and delegate a few employees only to form of a rapid response team charged with speaking to the ICE agent; request to see a signed and dated warrant or a signed and dated notice of investigation (NOI); request three days to provide documentation in the NOI; and contact immigration or criminal counsel immediately and before speaking to ICE.
Train human resources and/or compliance staff on I-9 completion, maintenance, E-Verify usage, and ICE investigation and raid preparation. It is important to show the DHS and ICE that the company is complying with the Trump administration's immigration agenda and existing immigration laws.
Maria Mejia-Opaciuch, senior counsel in the immigration practice group at Carlton Fields, is responsible for all of the firm's business immigration work. She can be reached at [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInitial Steps to Set Up a Fla. Appeal: Your Future Self (or Appellate Attorney) Will Thank You
6 minute readDivorce Timing Is Everything: Waiting for the New Year May Have Its Advantages
4 minute readMotions for Summary Judgment and Discovery: The 2021 Rule Changes Continue to Emerge
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Delaware Courts to Address in 2025
- 2Adapting to AI and the Needs of Lawyers Will Be Key For Shutts & Bowen, Says Incoming Ft. Lauderdale Leader
- 3What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
- 4The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
- 5Not Here: Court Finds Texas Has No Jurisdiction Over Google
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250