FNU's Miami Attorneys Could Land More Than $1 Million in Fees Winning Trademark Fight With FIU
Peretz, Chesal & Herrmann may be in line for at least $1 million in legal fees for beating Miami's public university.
June 26, 2018 at 02:03 PM
4 minute read
Steven Peretz of Peretz, Chesal & Herrmann
Peretz Chesal & Herrmann's successful defense of the private Florida National University against crosstown giant Florida International University's trademark infringement suit has put him in line for more than $1 million in attorney fees.
U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams issued an order Friday that the parties attempt to agree on an amount. As FNU's legal fees exceeded $1 million, that's likely to be the base figure.
Miami attorney Steven Peretz said his firm calculated its tab by applying a base market rate for the attorneys multiplied by the number of hours spent on the matter.
Peretz has represented Hialeah's for-profit Florida National University since 2013 when FIU, Miami's public university, sued over the similarity in names. The 55,000-student FIU claimed FNU's name caused unwarranted confusion in the marketplace and led to losses in admissions and tuition for FIU.
In response, FNU maintained, “The plaintiff has no enforceable rights against the defendant arising from defendant's use of 'university' and 'Florida' to accurately identify itself as a university located in Florida.”
Williams ruled against FIU in 2015, deciding college applicants weren't likely to confuse the two and finding no “compelling or persuasive evidence of intent to piggyback on FIU's name or goodwill.”
FIU appealed, which piled onto the Peretz Chesal fees after it won.
Fee awards like this one are rarely granted in trademark cases since the law restricts them to exceptional cases. To be labeled exceptional, the court must find that the lawsuit lacked merit or litigation was unreasonably pursued.
In this case, FIU was tripped up by its own testimony.
“When we took the deposition of the senior administrators at FIU, the marketing counsultant said she had not heard of Florida National before this lawsuit,” Peretz said.
Adding insult to injury, an outside marketing consultant who'd worked for FIU for four years stated FNU was “not on my radar screen at all.”
“It should have been made known to FIU by the decision-makers, as they interviewed their own witnesses ahead of time, that they didn't have any basis for saying there was confusion,” Peretz said.
Rafael Paz, associate general counsel at Florida International University, conceded in a deposition that he was unaware of “any instance where somebody applied to FIU thinking that FIU was associated with FNU.”
“At that point, this became a man-bites-dog case because although every side has a loser, in this case the losing side lost because their own witnesses gave bad testimony,” Peretz said.
Since much of the case rested on how much revenue was generated by each school, FIU's argument fell apart without proof that FNU gained a dollar in tuition or donations intended by students for FIU.
“After we got those admissions, there was no reason to pursue a claim for damages, but FIU pursued a claim for damages until the bitter end,” Peretz said.
Williams ordered the parties to meet and confer to see if the fees can be hashed out cordially.
A mediation session will follow if they disagree. Two previous attempts at mediation have been unsuccessful.
“Maybe the third time is the charm,” Peretz said. “We're hopeful that we can reach an agreement on the amount of fees and put this matter to rest.”
When reached for comment, FIU attorney David K. Friedland of Friedland Vining stated he did not wish to discuss the case while it's still pending.
Peretz expects to propose a fee amount for FIU within 30 days.
At the district court level, the Peretz Chesal attorneys expended about 2,750 hours over a two-year period. At the appellate level, the attorneys added about 700 hours in six months. The principal attorneys involved were partners Steven Peretz and Michael Chesal and associate Moish Peltz.
The attorney's hourly rates changed over the course of the case.
Read the court order:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Holland & Knight Matches Milbank Bonuses for Some Associates Holland & Knight Matches Milbank Bonuses for Some Associates](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/21/9d/a8e76c0a4c71a90a6636c9c8968a/gift-box-money-767x633.jpg)
![Elite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market Elite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c8/c2/a23560304b7fae55fc8a5eee4cde/gift-box-money-767x633.jpg)
Elite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market
9 minute read![Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6d/8e/6f9b547f45769a0c4ad93b90d625/gift-box-money-767x633-1.jpg)
![It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2024/10/AdobeStock_522058451-767x633.jpg)
It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250