Tax Reform's Underrated Commercial Real Estate Impact Amid Residential Frenzy
Following the approval of the federal tax reform bill, much of the discussion has centered on the legislation's disproportionately negative impact on tax-heavy states and the anticipated influx of residents from those states relocating to tax-free states like Florida.
July 09, 2018 at 11:55 AM
3 minute read
- Pass-through deductions. Anyone involved in real estate transactions knows that commercial property investors often create single-purpose limited liability companies (LLCs), partnerships or S Corporations (S Corps) as a safeguard from personal liability and a pass-through taxation option to avoid being taxed twice on the same income. The tax reform bill includes a new pass-through deduction provision for these corporate entities. Now, commercial real estate property owners operating as one of the above entities can obtain a 20 percent tax deduction on net income from rental properties—apartment complexes, shopping centers, office buildings and industrial facilities. This, combined with other measures such as carrying over select losses, will result in huge savings for savvy commercial investors.
- Depreciation deductions. In the pre-tax reform era, the ability to claim a bonus depreciation deduction on applicable commercial properties was limited to 50 percent of the property's cost. The new tax law makes that 100 percent if the property is “placed in service,” which marks the beginning of the depreciation period, after Sept. 27, 2017 and before Jan. 1, 2023. In South Florida, where a common complaint from buyers and would-be sellers of commercial property these days across all sectors is a pricing disconnect between the parties, the ability to take advantage of this provision could help close the gap in many instances. Additionally, the limit on deducting commercial property expenses under Section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code has been increased from $500,000 to $1 million. That should motivate commercial landlords to invest in their properties instead of socking away their cash reserves.
- Mortgage Interest. Commercial property owners can now deduct mortgage interest in full, and the net income is being taxed at 21 percent instead of 35 percent.
- Historic Preservation/Rehabilitation Tax Credits. South Florida is rife with buildings that have some level of historic protections and designations. One concern before the legislation was adopted was the potential elimination of a 20 percent tax credit for certified historic buildings. Fortunately, that tax credit was preserved—as long as it is claimed over a five-year period. This is big news in key urban neighborhoods in our region, especially Downtown Fort Lauderdale. We are seeing owners of historic buildings in Fort Lauderdale's urban core look to renovate and repurpose those buildings as the area becomes increasingly popular with younger residents.
Jaime Sturgis is the founder and CEO of Fort Lauderdale-based commercial real estate firm Native Realty. He specializes in leasing and investment sales in emerging markets throughout South Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250