Design District developer Craig Robins lost his fight to stop another big name in Miami real estate, Ugo Colombo, from seeking punitive damages in a drawn-out case over the private jet they once jointly owned.

The Third District Court of Appeal denied Robins' petition after a lower court allowed Colombo to amend his lawsuit against Robins to seek punitive damages. The three-judge panel on Wednesday unanimously affirmed a decision by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Barbara Areces.

Colombo, a pioneer in developing luxury Miami condominiums, and Robins, who gained fame for reviving Miami Beach's tired Art Deco properties, didn't return requests for comment by deadline.

Robins' attorney, Dennis Richard of Richard & Richard in Miami, isn't deterred by the decision.

“We plan to defeat Colombo's claims and recover against Colombo,” he said.

This is the latest action in the decadelong fight that started with the two real estate moguls co-owing a $22 million Bombardier Challenger.

Colombo bought the jet with an $18.5 million Bank of American loan in May 2007, and Robins, CEO and president of Dacra Development Corp., became a co-owner later that year, according to court filings. Colombo owned the jet through UC Challenger LLC, affiliated with CMC Group, until Robins bought a half interest in UC Challenger using his Dacra affiliate CL36 Leasing LLC.

Robins assumed a $9.25 million loan, and Colombo's loan was cut to that amount. The two also signed agreements evenly splitting jet maintenance and dividing operating costs based on usage, Colombo has argued in court filings.

But Colombo accused Robins of defaulting, including skipping payment for a $200,000 round-the-world trip, as a way to wiggle out of his contract and have Colombo pay Robins' share, according to a second amended third-party complaint filed in 2015.

“Over time, Robins grew 'tired' of owning the aircraft and paying the heavy financial obligations he had assumed,” according to the complaint.

Bank of America sued Colombo and UC Challenger in 2013, claiming a default on the loan and an interest-rate swap agreement, Colombo argued in court.

For his part, Robins countersued saying Colombo and two UC Challenger managers purposely didn't sell the jet under a forbearance agreement with the bank and, despite multiple offers, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a way to sell the plane to a Colombo company, according to his 2015 lawsuit.

The jet was sold in the bankruptcy proceeding.

Robins listed breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty counts.

Colombo's lawsuit against Robins Dacra and CL36 listed breach of fiduciary and contractual duties, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference, contribution and indemnity and breach of contract counts.

He then sought to add punitive damages. Areces agreed this year, and the Third DCA upheld the decision.

The appellate court disagreed with Robins' argument that he didn't have an opportunity to have his say in a 30-minute hearing on the punitive damages motion. Although the hearing was short, Judge Kevin Emas wrote for the panel that nothing stopped Robins from making his case.

“Nor did petitioner lodge any objection to the court's procedure or assert at the hearing that it was in any way foreclosed from presenting argument in opposition to the motion to amend,” Emas wrote with Judges Barbara Lagoa and Ivan Fernandez concurring.

In a court filing against opposing punitive damages, Robins also argued Colombo lacked a basis to seek punitive damages and instead relied on pejorative characterizations of Robins such as calling him a “weasel” and saying “he stabbed his partner in the back.”

The appellate court said it's not allowed to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to allow for a punitive damages claim.

Coffey Burlington partners Kendall Coffey and Jeffrey Crockett represented Colombo on appeal.

“The claim is that Craig Robins deceitfully conspired to harm Ugo Colombo, his partner. The trial court found that Colombo's case presented a reasonable basis for the recovery of punitive damages against Robins personally,” the attorneys said in an emailed statement. “Robins appealed this decision but lost, and faces punitive damages in a jury trial.”

“Colombo's counsel's construction of the opinion is nonsense,” Richard responded. He declined further comment.

Areces also denied Robins' motion for summary judgment on Colombo's lawsuit.

Emas speculated Robins didn't speak against punitive damages with the summary judgment motion pending.

“It appears from a review of the hearing transcript that petitioner decided to 'keep his powder dry' to await argument on his summary judgment motion that immediately followed,” the judge wrote, “believing that a favorable ruling on summary judgment would render moot respondents' request to amend the complaint.”

The case brought another big name in South Florida real estate into the picture. Turnberry Management III Inc., an affiliate of developer Jeffrey Soffer's Turnberry Ltd., was hired to manage the jet and sued Dacra, prompting Robins to sue Colombo, claiming he is behind the Turnberry lawsuit.