Broward Jury Awards $1.8 Million to Investor Defrauded in Real Estate Scam
Serhan Unsal, a Turkish national looking to turn a profit in South Florida real estate, accused brokers Taner Gokalp and Ertugrul Meric of deceiving him out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. A Broward jury awarded him treble damages.
August 10, 2018 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
A Broward jury awarded more than $1.8 million to a foreign investor who found himself swept up in a property con job.
Serhan Unsal, a Turkish textile factory owner and investor, brought a civil theft suit against defendants Taner Gokalp and Ertugrul Meric. The jury awarded him treble damages, returning a verdict for $1.812 million.
According to an amended complaint filed in the civil division of Broward County Circuit Court, Unsal, who was looking to get a foothold in the South Florida real estate market, was defrauded of hundreds of thousands of dollars by Gokalp and Meric while purchasing Broward County properties in 2013.
Click here to read the judgment against Gokalp and Meric
Meric had previously worked for Unsal and approached his former employer in 2012, proposing they work together to invest in the South Florida real estate market.
According to Unsal's attorney, Coral Gables-based litigator Brian Barakat, Meric touted an earlier stint residing in South Florida, in order to convince the investor to work with him.
“[Meric] claimed that as a result of the real estate crash, he knew how to get properties under market value,” said Barakat, founding partner at Barakat Law.
But Barakat said that unbeknownst to his client, Meric and Gokalp were working together.
The suit alleges Meric collaborated with Gokalp to tack on thousands of dollars to the asking price to overcharge Unsal on the properties they presented. The defendants allegedly pretended that the numbers they quoted were listing prices. The two men then allegedly split the earnings of their scheme.
“That's the shill. You bring somebody in and gain their confidence by doing a good, solid transaction. [Meric and Gokalp] found two properties and presented them both to Mr. Unsal at inflated prices,” Barakat said. “[They] said they were good deals, had been fully inspected. Once they had that confidence they started to profit for themselves.”
Defense counsel Mark A. Levy of Fort Lauderdale-based Brinkley Morgan blamed Meric. He told the Daily Business Review that his client, Gokalp, is “being unfairly held responsible for the wrongs of the true bad actor, Ertugrul Meric.”
“My clients were very disappointed in the result,” Levy said. “We anticipate appealing a number of issues.”
The suit accuses the defendants of directing Unsal to send money to be held in escrow, but instead held the funds in dummy corporations used by Gokalp to both conceal his identity and hoard his allegedly ill-gotten gains. It also alleges that the defendants misled Unsal on whether the properties had tenants, leaving Unsal under the false impression that the buildings were vacant. They then allegedly pocketed the rental income they collected from these tenants.
Barakat claimed Unsal was defrauded of nearly $300,000 from two properties and was deprived of another $167,000 on three subsequent real estate purchases.
The plaintiff allegedly discovered Gokalp and Meric's conspiracy after conducting an audit of his real estate holdings in late 2013 only to discover several inconsistencies, including that properties he believed he had purchased were not under his name. Rather, he found the sites belonged to Samtrac Corp. and Arthur & Sanders, companies that the complaint links to Gokalp and Meric.
After a trial in April, the jury returned a verdict in Unsal's favor in May.
“During the trial we presented evidence of all five transactions. I was pretty upfront with the jury that although I thought the defendants were liable for all five, we were only asking for [a verdict] covering the first two. The jury was so incensed by the blatant fraud they ordered us everything,” Barakat says. “And because it's a civil theft case, everything was tripled.”
Read ruling against Gokalp and Meric here:
Read Unsal's amended complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 2What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 3Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 4Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
- 5Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250