Soto's Chess Game: Miami-Dade's Chief Judge Grapples With Judicial Vacancies in an Understaffed Circuit
Even as Chief Judge Soto is overjoyed by an influx of judges into the Miami-Dade county and circuit court systems, their very appointments speak to a larger problem within Miami's judiciary.
August 13, 2018 at 06:00 AM
8 minute read
For all of the sentimentality and excitement surrounding investitures, their frequency speaks to one of the principal challenges Miami-Dade Chief Judge Bertila Soto has faced in her position: filling the gaps left by judicial vacancies.
Since becoming chief judge in 2013, Soto has overseen 56 investitures.
Her job carries many responsibilities — assigning judges and court officers, implementing a system that addresses all cases and complaints brought before Miami-Dade courts and ensuring the smooth operation of her circuit's day-to-day affairs.
Miami-Dade Will Lose These 14 Judges This Year
But it's the investitures that speak to the toughest challenge — and “one of the best parts” of her job.
“You get to meet the judge and hear the friends that they've selected talk about themselves,” Soto said. “Their families attend and you hear their background about why they became a judge, how they became a judge, their dreams and their struggles, and it gives you an insight that you might not otherwise have. Some of the judges equate it to being their eulogy in life. It's a really beautiful experience and it's a gift to me [and other judges] to get to know our new colleagues.”
Soto brings passion to everything she does, whether it's in her position supervising Miami-Dade courts or simply decorating her chambers with wall-to-wall paraphernalia of her favorite college football team, the Miami Hurricanes.
Get to Know Miami-Dade's 15 New Judges
So the chief judge does not mince words when discussing the ongoing attention that judicial vacancies require from her and the courts at large, referring to the constant, strategic maneuvering as a game of chess.
“We always love to have new judges and fresh perspectives. That's part of the process. We know as judges when we run [for office] or are appointed that there's a chance that we won't be a judge the next time,” Soto says. “But it does have an impact, because all of those vacancies last anywhere from 60 to 90 days, and sometimes longer if a judge retires and their seat was up for election.”
22 New County Court Judges in 2 Years
Soto cites the example of Judge Teretha Thomas, whose last day on the bench was July 31. However, because Thomas was elected, and the next election will not take place until Aug. 28, her seat will remain empty until the winner of the election takes office in January 2019. This will leave Soto juggling six months' worth of hearings.
Although there are systems — such as the use of senior judges — in place to address occasions such as Thomas' retirement, the circuit has seen a rash of retirements and appointments in recent months. Given Miami-Dade's status as the largest judicial circuit in Florida, and the fourth largest in the United States, caseloads pile up quickly and judicial vacancies can become a sizable conundrum.
“On Aug. 31, Wendell Graham is retiring, which was unexpected. His seat isn't going to election but the appointment process usually takes 90 days,” Soto said.
Sometimes, the appointment process is swift. For instance, within a year, Judge Renatha Francis occupied two spots on the bench. First, in August 2017, Gov. Rick Scott appointed her to the Miami-Dade County Court. By the following June, she had risen to the circuit bench to replace a departing judge.
“When [county judges] get appointed I have a vacancy at the county level going into the circuit level,” Soto says. “One vacancy gets plugged in and another one occurs. By the end of 2018, there'll have been 22 new county court judges in the last two years.”
'Starting Over From Scratch'
Soto is far from the only one feeling the pressure of turnovers in the judiciary.
“Whether it's because a judge is retiring, has resigned or simply is not reelected to the position, you always have a concern that at some point in time the judge is going to change,” said David Weinstein, partner at Miami-based Hinshaw & Culbertson.
Weinstein, who once worked as a prosecutor with the Southern District of Florida and the Miami-Dade County State Attorney's Office, is well-acquainted with the myriad problems such rampant judicial vacancies can cause. Now, as a defense attorney, he is concerned about time lost in bringing new or temporary judges up to speed on the subtleties of each case.
“The danger that you suffer is that you've educated a judge about the intricacies of a case, and then that judge is gone and you're starting over again from ground zero with the new judge,” Weinstein says. “In a criminal case there's speedy trial issues to contend with and the right of the defendant to go to trial. In civil cases things tend to drag on a bit longer because you're litigating about money; in dependency, family court and in probate sometimes it moves even slower.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250