Suit Claims High-End Miami Brokerage RelatedISG Sent Unsolicited Texts
RelatedISG International Realty is accused of sending unsolicited text messages promoting its services and listings.
August 13, 2018 at 04:02 PM
4 minute read
Luxury South Florida real estate brokerage RelatedISG International Realty has been accused of breaking the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited texts promoting its services and listings.
RelatedISG, based in Miami-Dade County and created from the partnership of developer The Related Group and sales and marketing firm International Sales Group LLC, sells residential and commercial real estate and markets projects, some of them still pre-construction.
RelatedISG allegedly sent the unsolicited text messages using an automatic telephone dialing system to recipients in South Florida in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the 1991 law adopted to protect from abusive telemarketing. The law was adopted with phone calls and faxes in mind but now it applies to texts, too.
RelatedISG and International Sales Group didn't return a request for comment, and The Related Group declined comment.
The plaintiff is Manuel Gonzalez, although little information is provided on who he is aside that he lives in Miami-Dade. He asserts that RelatedISG sent similar text messages to the messages he got to thousands of recipients, also without their consent.
Gonzalez received four texts between June 29 and July 4 from a short phone number promoting homes for sale starting in the mid-$300,000s in Southwest Miami-Dade, according to the complaint filed Thursday in federal court for the Southern District of Florida.
“Related Realty's unsolicited texts were a nuisance that aggravated plaintiff, wasted his time, invaded his privacy, diminished the value of the cellular services he paid for, caused him to temporarily lose the use and enjoyment of his cell phone, and caused wear and tear to his phone's data, memory, software, hardware, and battery,” Kaufman attorney Avi Kaufman wrote in the complaint.
He declined to comment further when reached by phone.
The lawsuit seeks an injunction for RelatedISG to stop sending the texts, an award of actual and/or statutory damages, an order certifying this case as a class action and appointing Gonzalez as class representative, and a jury trial.
Erica Rutner, a partner in Lash & Goldberg in Miami who represents defendants in TCPA lawsuits, said she has seen an increase in lawsuits filed under the act in Florida's Southern District, against real estate companies and other businesses.
That's because of a July 10, 2015, ruling by the Federal Communications Commission, which implements and enforces the TCPA, that made it easier to bring lawsuits under the act, Rutner said. The ruling broadened the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system, which must be used for a defendant to be held liable under the act.
“The statutory definition of an ADTS, or an automatic telephone dialing system, is defined as equipment that has the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called using a random or sequential number generator. … It's sort of a convoluted definition. It gave rise to a lot of confusion in the courts as to what type of equipment counts as an ADTS. In 2015, the FCC determined that in their view of the way ADTS is defined, any equipment that's used to make calls or send text messages qualifies as an auto-dialer as long as it has a potential future capability to dial,” Rutner said.
That qualified even smartphones as auto-dialers, she added.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a March review said the FCC ruling would subject millions of consumers to TCPA liability, not just companies, and told the FCC to re-evaluate its decision, according to Rutner.
“Since we don't have that (ADTS) definition yet, there's still a lot of ambiguity in what direction the law is going to go in,” she said. “That's maybe why we are seeing a lot of these TCPA cases.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250