Alan B. Schneider Challenging Incumbent Judge Ernest Albert Kollra for Broward Circuit Judge
Incumbent Broward Circuit Court Judge Albert Kollra is being challenged by Alan B. Schneider for a spot on the Circuit Court, Group 8.
August 20, 2018 at 06:51 PM
4 minute read
This installment of the Daily Business Review's coverage of the August primary elections features a Q&A with incumbent Broward Circuit Court Judge Albert Kollra. He's being challenged by Alan B. Schneider for a spot on the Circuit Court, Group 8. Schneider did not respond to requests for comment by deadline, but here's what Kollra had to say about what qualifies him for the bench. Responses have been edited for style and content.
|Judge Ernest Albert Kollra
Kollra has been a member of the Florida Bar since 1978 and was a partner at Ernest A. Kollra P.A., where he conducted hundreds of jury trials before being appointed to the 17th Judicial Circuit Court. He is currently assigned to the Criminal Division.
Why do you want to be a circuit court judge?
Kollra: I wish to remain a Circuit Court judge as I have found it to be the most rewarding job in my legal career. It is why I arrive every day at 6 a.m. and usually work past 5 p.m. I take great pride in the honor bestowed on me to serve the residents of Broward County as their circuit court judge.
What about your experience qualifies you for the position?
Kollra: I was an attorney for over 30 years before becoming a judge, and in that time I represented all types of individuals and corporations in civil and criminal matters. In private practice, no matter what type of matter I was handling, I always took the time to listen to my clients. Additionally, I always put in the time to be the most prepared attorney I could be for my clients.
I always respected that fact that a client's case was never “just another case,” but something deeply personal and important to them. These experiences as an attorney carry over into how I comport myself as a Judge.
I currently serve in the Criminal Division. I strive to make sure all parties involved in a matter before me are treated with dignity and respect. I accomplish this through listening, explaining and preparation. I always take the time review the case file, listen to all parties in a case and give a detailed explanation for my decision. I strive to have those who come to my courtroom, whether they agree with my ruling or not, feel that I took their matter seriously and did not treat them as just another case number.
What's your biggest achievement so far?
Kollra: Being married to my high school sweetheart for over 40 years.
What would a successful term look like for you?
Kollra: Six more years of the same. Early days and working into the night. Being in my office early in the morning reviewing case files. Taking the bench every day at 8:30 a.m., presiding over trials and hearings. Ending my day reviewing more files before I leave for the evening.
What is the most important issue facing the Broward circuit at the moment?
Kollra: The perception that litigants are treated differently because of their race, gender or economic situation. I strive to treat everyone in my courtroom the same. I see a defendant no different whether they are represented by private counsel or a public defender. I view nor treat any party different than another because of their race, gender, economic status, or any other reason.
I understand that people may not always agree with how I rule, but it is important to me to make sure that those who came through my courtroom felt they were heard, given a through explanation of my ruling and treated with as much dignity and respect as the next person.
|Alan B. Schneider
Admitted to the Florida Bar in 1991, Schneider's legal practice has primarily involved real estate and business transactions, but has also consisted of family law, commercial litigation, foreclosure litigation, community association, probate administration, and property tax appeals and exemptions. He is also a Circuit-Civil Mediator certified by the Florida Supreme Court, and has owned and operated a law firm and title insurance agency since 1997.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250