Diversity Initiative Certifies Law Firms for Women, Minority Leadership
Over 40 law firms can now call themselves Mansfield certified, and Holland & Knight is on a shortlist for leadership achievements.
August 20, 2018 at 04:32 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Launched last summer as a corrective measure in a profession dominated by white men, the Mansfield Rule sought to tackle the gender and diversity gap in Big Law leadership in part by using a powerful promise: bragging rights.
Now, 41 of the nearly 50 firms that implemented the rule in its inaugural pilot year have earned those rights, receiving the coveted designation Mansfield certified.
“Law firms are not typically early adopters on risky endeavors, especially ones where the results will be made public,” said Caren Ulrich Stacy, CEO of the Diversity Lab, which worked with the firms to implement the Mansfield Rule.
“But these 41 firms showed their true desire to boost diversity in leadership by trying something new and tough to implement,” she said.
A smaller field of 27 firms, including Holland & Knight, reached certification plus status, and it's the only Florida-based firm on the list. In addition to pipeline recognition, the “plus” firms reached at least 30 percent women and minority lawyer representation in a significant number of their leadership roles and committees.
“We believe that this initiative has the power to truly transform and influence the leadership structures of law firms and are excited to see more law firms and corporations join the program,” said Judy Nemsick, chair of Holland & Knight's Women's Initiative.
Adopted from the National Football League's Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview at least one minority candidate for general manager or head coaching positions, the Mansfield Rule was developed following the 2016 Women in Law Hackathon.
The rule requires that at least 30 percent of participating law firm candidate pools for leadership or governance roles — as well as equity partner promotions and senior lateral positions—be comprised of women or minorities.
In its inaugural year, the Diversity Lab collected data and information from law firms at the six-month and one-year marks. It also collected data at the conclusion of the first year of implementation on leadership roles, promotions and hiring outcomes to determine certification, Stacy said.
“This is a long-term play,” she said. “These firms are taking intentional and measured actions to diversify their leadership ranks.”
The law firms that can now call themselves Mansfield certified are: Akerman; Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer; Blank Rome; Brinks Gilson & Lione; Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney; Clifford Chance; Cooley; Covington & Burling; Day Pitney; Dentons; DLA Piper; Dorsey & Whitney; Faegre Baker Daniels; Fasken; Fenwick & West; Fish & Richardson; Goodwin Procter; Holland & Hart; Holland & Knight; Jenner & Block; Katten Muchin Rosenman; Latham & Watkins; Littler Mendelson; McDermott Will & Emery; Miller Canfield; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Morris, Manning & Martin; Morrison & Foerster; Munger, Tolles & Olson; Nixon Peabody; Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe; O'Melveny & Myers; Reed Smith; Seyfarth Shaw; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton; Troutman Sanders; White & Case; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; and Winston & Strawn.
In addition to the incremental increases in diverse candidates considered for some of Big Law's top positions, Diversity Lab also found a significant surge in firms that are now tracking and measuring their candidate pipelines.
Prior to implementing the Mansfield Rule, only 30 percent of the 41 Mansfield certified firms tracked diversity statistics among their pool of candidates for leadership positions, and an even smaller percentage tracked their lateral hirings for senior associate and partner positions. Now all 41 firms are tracking this information, the data found.
“The Mansfield Rule has really brought a rigor and discipline to the whole process,” said David Koschik, partner and member of White & Case's executive committee.
“It's also caused us to look at situations where we might either not have a female partner or diverse partner in our minds ready for a leadership opportunity,” he said. “It's caused us to look at why that is,”
Koschik also noted there is an external component to being Mansfield certified that holds firms publicly accountable to clients and potential clients on the advancement of women and minorities.
Stacy noted 70 legal departments have asked their current and potential outside counsel if they are certified or are in the process of becoming certified.
Earlier this summer, the Diversity Lab announced Mansfield 2.0, which will broaden the obligation of law firms and expand the rule to include LGBTQ+ attorneys for the 65 law firms that have already signed on.
And while there were a handful of firms that didn't finish the process or meet the requirements to become Mansfield certified in its inaugural year, Stacy said Diversity Lab will keep working with them.
“Even if firms don't qualify now, participation is encouraged and important because the act of measuring causes improvement,” she said.
It's the firms that haven't made the commitment that have the biggest challenge, Stacy said.
“They have a problem. They know they have a problem. And they still don't do anything about it,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAgainst the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
3 minute readNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 2Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
- 3NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 4Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying Up to $140K
- 5'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250