Richard Brian Kaplan Challenging Incumbent Judge Michael Usan for Broward Circuit Court
Incumbent Broward Circuit Court Judge Michael Usan is being challenged by Richard Brian Kaplan for a spot on the Broward Circuit Court, Group 42.
August 20, 2018 at 05:34 PM
6 minute read
This installment of the Daily Business Review's coverage of the August primary elections features a Q&A with incumbent Broward Circuit Court Judge Michael Usan. He is being challenged by Richard Brian Kaplan for a spot on the Broward Circuit Court, Group 42.
Kaplan did not respond to requests for comment, but here's what Usan had to say about what qualifies him for the bench. Responses have been edited for style and content.
|Judge Michael Usan
A Gulf War veteran, Judge Michael Usan served as an assistant state attorney before going into private practice in 1994. Seventeen years later, Usan was recommended for appointment to the bench by the Judicial Nominating Commission and was appointed to the Circuit Court in January 2010. Usan was elected to a full term in 2012. Since taking the bench, he has been assigned to the Criminal Felony Trial Division.
Why do you want to become/remain a circuit court judge?
Usan: I hope to be re-elected to serve another term as your circuit court judge. It is certainly both an honor and a privilege to hold this position. I find serving as a judge has been the most rewarding and fulfilling aspect of my legal career. I have been a member of the Florida Bar for over 31 years. I tried more than 200 jury trials as an attorney before taking the bench. Over the course of my years as an attorney, I have prosecuted and defended criminal cases, handled civil law claims, adoptions, administrative hearings, FAA boards, and done estate planning. For more than 17 years, I ran a successful private practice. My time as a private practice attorney was financially rewarding, but I felt that there was something missing in my life. I wanted the sense of satisfaction I felt when I was a member of the armed forces. I am proud to be a veteran of the U.S. Air Force, where I served eight years in the reserves and five years on active duty, including service during the Gulf War. Serving your nation and being a part of a cause greater than yourself is the greatest, most rewarding work experience. I found that same feeling of pride and satisfaction in being a judge. I love the work I do every day and hope to continue to serve with the people of Broward County with honor and distinction.
What about your experience qualifies you for the position?
Usan: Being “qualified” to be a circuit judge should be more than having been a member of the bar for five years and paying a qualifying fee. What matters most is experience. I have over 31 years as a member of the Florida Bar. I am admitted to practice before numerous courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States. Before taking the bench, I handled thousands of cases and tried more than 200 jury trials. Of all the candidates running in all of the races, I am the only one who has prosecuted, defended and presided over death penalty cases.
My expertise as a criminal law judge is recognized throughout the state. I am on the faculty of the Florida Judicial College and the Florida College of Advance judicial Studies. I am proud to have been hand selected as one of four judges to teach the criminal law course at FJC. All newly elected or appointed judges in Florida must attend this weeklong course. I have also authored and instructed more than a dozen CJE courses used to teach other judges.
Additionally, since I have been serving as a circuit judge for the past nine years, I do not have to speculate on what type of judge I think I'll be or I hope I'll be. I have garnered a reputation in the legal community for being a fair, efficient, knowledgeable and respectful jurist. This is what I believe makes me qualified.
What's your biggest achievement so far?
Usan: Raising my two children to be responsible young adults. Both finished high school this year and are about to start college.
What would a successful term look like for you?
Usan: I hope to continue serving with the same commitment to excellence I have brought over the past nine years. If re-elected, I anticipate being moved into the ROC court, which is set up to handle recidivist and career criminal cases. Later in the term, I would be interested in transitioning into a Circuit Civil position.
What is the most important issue facing the Broward circuit court at the moment?
Usan: Perhaps the biggest problem facing the 17th Circuit currently is the tremendous turnover we have seen in the past two years. One-third of the present judiciary has less than three years' experience. We have had many exceptionally talented, long-term judges retire during this period and more will follow by year-end. While change can be a positive thing, too much change too rapidly can diminish the experience base of our judiciary.
|Richard Brian Kaplan
For the past decade, Kaplan has worked for the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel-District, where he currently serves as civil litigation director. He previously served as an assistant attorney general for the Florida Attorney General's Office, senior attorney for the Department of Children and Families, and one year worked as assistant city manager in the township of Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Kaplan has helped initiate and grow a number of specialty courts in Broward County, including the Early Childhood Court, Dependency Drug Court, Seminole Tribal Court, and the Marchman Act Court, assisting residents with drug treatment, mental health services, parenting classes, and child care services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250