Ex-Elected Officials Fight Constitution Commission's Ballot Proposals
Pointing to ideological opposition to the process rather than the specifics of the proposed constitutional amendments, the 16-member group called Save My Constitution described the eight ballot measures as “confusing” and “misleading.”
August 23, 2018 at 12:34 PM
5 minute read
A group of former state and federal lawmakers and two former lieutenant governors said it will fight the Florida Constitution Revision Commission's entire slate of amendments going before voters in November.
Pointing to ideological opposition to the process rather than the specifics of the proposed constitutional amendments, the 16-member group called Save My Constitution described the eight ballot measures as “confusing” and “misleading.”
“We're not looking at any single issue,” said Jim Kallinger, a former state House member from Central Florida who is among the leaders of Save My Constitution. “We're saying vote 'no' on everything, because we feel they were conceived in a deceptive way. We're going to address the process.”
The new group, which held a press conference at the Capitol, intends to campaign against the different measures. Also, group members will push to end the once-every-20-year process that they say allows the governor and legislative leaders to name “lobbyists” and “political insiders” to the CRC. The 37-member commission has unique power to place amendments on the ballot.
“It's an unelected body that, frankly, doesn't represent anybody,” former Lt. Gov. Jeff Kottkamp said of the commission. “It's not accountable to anybody, and it conducted its affairs in what we believe was well beyond the scope of their authority.”
Seven of the eight proposals have drawn legal challenges, and circuit judges have ordered the removal of two of the amendments from the ballot. The state has appealed both of those orders.
The Florida Supreme Court on Aug. 29 will take up what is known as Amendment 13, which seeks to ban greyhound racing at Florida dog tracks. Leon County Circuit Judge Karen Gievers blocked the measure, agreeing with breeders, owners and trainers that the proposal would mislead voters.
On Monday, Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooper ordered an education measure known as Amendment 8 off the ballot. Cooper said the amendment, which deals with three education issues, would fail to inform voters of its impact on the creation of charter schools. The state quickly gave notice that it would appeal Cooper's decision.
Also, a legal challenge has been filed directly to the Supreme Court seeking to block six of the CRC's ballot initiatives, including the education measure. Plaintiffs in that lawsuit, including former Supreme Court Justice Harry Lee Anstead, argue that combining disparate issues in single ballot proposals violates First Amendment rights of voters.
The CRC's practice of bundling multiple topics into single amendments has drawn controversy for months.
Kallinger and other members of the Save My Constitution group said that if the commission is allowed to continue in the future, it should be limited to placing single topics in ballot proposals. That would be similar to requirements for amendments put on the ballot through petition drives.
Kallinger said his impetus for forming the group was Amendment 9, which asks voters to approve a ban on offshore oil drilling and a ban on vaping and the use of electronic cigarettes in workplaces.
The amendment also has drawn opposition from a coalition known as “Explore Offshore,” which is backed by the American Petroleum Institute and the Florida Petroleum Council. Kottkamp also is part of that coalition.
The Save My Constitution group intends to hit the campaign trail through personal appearances as well as print and TV ads.
“Because the CRC has been deceptive and their proposals are indeed defective, we must tell the people of Florida that in order to be safe, it is best that we vote no on all of those amendments,” said Ken Littlefield, a former state lawmaker who represented Hillsborough and Pasco counties.
Others who have joined the group include former Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll and former U.S. Reps. Sandy Adams and Connie Mack.
Each amendment requires 60 percent approval from voters.
Other amendments placed on the ballot by the commission are:
• Amendment 6, which seeks to expand the rights of crime victims and raise the mandatory retirement age of judges.
• Amendment 7, which deals with governance of the state-college system and death benefits for survivors of first responders and military members.
• Amendment 10, which seeks to change the start dates of legislative sessions and require charter county governments to have elected constitutional officers.
• Amendment 11, which seeks to remove constitutional language that prohibits “aliens ineligible for citizenship” from owning property and revise language to make clear that the repeal of criminal statutes does not affect the prosecution of crimes committed before the repeal.
• Amendment 12, which calls for setting new ethics standards for public officials and imposing a six-year lobbying ban on state elected officials, state agency heads and local elected officials.
Jim Turner reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250