11 Women Sue Massage Envy Chain Over Alleged Sexual Assault in Florida
The complaint was filed by attorneys Jennifer Lipinski of South Florida firm Gordon & Doner and Brian Kent of Laffey, Bucci, & Kent in Philadelphia. The plaintiffs are 11 Jane Does, who allege the company failed to properly vet its employees and neglected to protect its customers from harm.
August 27, 2018 at 04:33 PM
5 minute read
A lawsuit filed Monday is alleging that Massage Envy deliberately concealed from prospective customers the existence of sexual assaults perpetrated by company employees.
According to the 163-page complaint filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court, Massage Envy ”not only failed to provide basic safety to clients in a most vulnerable setting, but it systemically and intentionally conspired and concealed the rampant problem of massage therapists at Massage Envy franchise locations sexually assaulting customers throughout the country.”
The lawsuit includes accounts from 11 Jane Doe plaintiffs, all of whom allege that they were inappropriately touched or sexually assaulted by Massage Envy employees.
The incidents described purportedly took place at nine different Massage Envy locations in Florida, including franchises in Palm Beach, Sarasota and Duval Counties.
For its part, Massage Envy said it was committed to protecting customers and staff, and directed the Daily Business Review to a web page detailing its efforts.
Click here to read Massage Envy's full Commitment to Safety plan.
The company also offered the following statement:
“While we aren't able to comment on active litigation, we can tell you that we focused on our Commitment to Safety plan which is further strengthening our existing policies,” the statement read. “Safety is and will always be our priority and we will never stop working on it.”
The plaintiffs are represented by attorneys Jennifer Lipinski of South Florida firm Gordon & Doner and Brian Kent of Laffey, Bucci & Kent in Philadelphia. Kent recently filed a suit against Massage Envy with similar allegations in California. Many of his clients shared their stories in a November 2017 Buzzfeed story that went viral.
Kent tells the Daily Business Review that he has worked on similar suits against Massage Envy for several years.
“The consistent theme was none of these women knew about these problems of sexual assaults happening by [Massage Envy] massage therapists. They were extremely upset not just that they were exploited … but that they were kept in the dark and the decision about their safety was taken out of their hands,” Kent said. “These lawsuits are really about transparency and what Massage Envy has done to conceal this sort of rampant problem that they have in their business from the public.”
Kent notes that many Massage Envy customers visit the spa chain for relief from physical and mental ailments, and that these assaults have affected their ability to get treatment while feeling safe and secure.
When it came time to file a lawsuit in Florida, Kent brought on Lipinski due to the two's previous familiarity as well as Lipinski's experience representing survivors of assault.
“There are a lot of women who have come forward in the #Metoo movement, and it's nice for them to have a female litigator to talk to and confide these problems in,” Lipinski said. “Because after they were just assaulted by a man, they don't want to talk to a man.”
Both attorneys have worked on high-profile cases previously: Kent has filed two lawsuits against Penn State for their involvement and knowledge of the sexual abuse perpetrated by ex-coach Jerry Sandusky. Lipinski, meanwhile, has helped secure a $1.7 million wrongful death settlement with the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office for the 2012 killing of mentally ill teen Michael Camberdella by an officer.
Related: Family of Fatally Shot Teen to Receive $1.7M From Palm Beach Sheriff
Kent claimed that he has not witnessed this scale of an institutional cover-up in a private corporation before.
“Usually it's an institutional assault that's led to [sexual assaults] occurring. I think in the business of massage therapy, you need extra safeguards because of the vulnerability of customers being in a closed room with strangers with their clothes off,” Kent said.”There are plenty of massage businesses throughout the country and I have not seen anything like this. We're seeing multiple victims at the same franchise in multiple states throughout the county; this is not an individual problem.”
Lipinski explained that both her and Kent understand the difficulties involved for victims when sharing their stories of sexual assault.
“We're so proud of our clients for finding the strength to come forward — many were scared to for a variety of reasons,” Lipinski said, noting that she and Kent are “happy to stand hand in hand” with the plaintiffs in their case against Massage Envy.
Read the complaint against Massage Envy filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court-Appointed Arbitrators
3 minute read$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250