11 Women Sue Massage Envy Chain Over Alleged Sexual Assault in Florida
The complaint was filed by attorneys Jennifer Lipinski of South Florida firm Gordon & Doner and Brian Kent of Laffey, Bucci, & Kent in Philadelphia. The plaintiffs are 11 Jane Does, who allege the company failed to properly vet its employees and neglected to protect its customers from harm.
August 27, 2018 at 04:33 PM
5 minute read
Spa chain Massage Envy has been accused of failing to protect its customers at several Florida locations. Credit: Zoriana Zaitseva/Shutterstock.com
A lawsuit filed Monday is alleging that Massage Envy deliberately concealed from prospective customers the existence of sexual assaults perpetrated by company employees.
According to the 163-page complaint filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court, Massage Envy ”not only failed to provide basic safety to clients in a most vulnerable setting, but it systemically and intentionally conspired and concealed the rampant problem of massage therapists at Massage Envy franchise locations sexually assaulting customers throughout the country.”
The lawsuit includes accounts from 11 Jane Doe plaintiffs, all of whom allege that they were inappropriately touched or sexually assaulted by Massage Envy employees.
The incidents described purportedly took place at nine different Massage Envy locations in Florida, including franchises in Palm Beach, Sarasota and Duval Counties.
For its part, Massage Envy said it was committed to protecting customers and staff, and directed the Daily Business Review to a web page detailing its efforts.
Click here to read Massage Envy's full Commitment to Safety plan.
The company also offered the following statement:
“While we aren't able to comment on active litigation, we can tell you that we focused on our Commitment to Safety plan which is further strengthening our existing policies,” the statement read. “Safety is and will always be our priority and we will never stop working on it.”
The plaintiffs are represented by attorneys Jennifer Lipinski of South Florida firm Gordon & Doner and Brian Kent of Laffey, Bucci & Kent in Philadelphia. Kent recently filed a suit against Massage Envy with similar allegations in California. Many of his clients shared their stories in a November 2017 Buzzfeed story that went viral.
Kent tells the Daily Business Review that he has worked on similar suits against Massage Envy for several years.
![](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2018/08/Kent-Lipinski-Vert-201808271939.jpg)
“The consistent theme was none of these women knew about these problems of sexual assaults happening by [Massage Envy] massage therapists. They were extremely upset not just that they were exploited … but that they were kept in the dark and the decision about their safety was taken out of their hands,” Kent said. “These lawsuits are really about transparency and what Massage Envy has done to conceal this sort of rampant problem that they have in their business from the public.”
Kent notes that many Massage Envy customers visit the spa chain for relief from physical and mental ailments, and that these assaults have affected their ability to get treatment while feeling safe and secure.
When it came time to file a lawsuit in Florida, Kent brought on Lipinski due to the two's previous familiarity as well as Lipinski's experience representing survivors of assault.
“There are a lot of women who have come forward in the #Metoo movement, and it's nice for them to have a female litigator to talk to and confide these problems in,” Lipinski said. “Because after they were just assaulted by a man, they don't want to talk to a man.”
Both attorneys have worked on high-profile cases previously: Kent has filed two lawsuits against Penn State for their involvement and knowledge of the sexual abuse perpetrated by ex-coach Jerry Sandusky. Lipinski, meanwhile, has helped secure a $1.7 million wrongful death settlement with the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office for the 2012 killing of mentally ill teen Michael Camberdella by an officer.
Related: Family of Fatally Shot Teen to Receive $1.7M From Palm Beach Sheriff
Kent claimed that he has not witnessed this scale of an institutional cover-up in a private corporation before.
“Usually it's an institutional assault that's led to [sexual assaults] occurring. I think in the business of massage therapy, you need extra safeguards because of the vulnerability of customers being in a closed room with strangers with their clothes off,” Kent said.”There are plenty of massage businesses throughout the country and I have not seen anything like this. We're seeing multiple victims at the same franchise in multiple states throughout the county; this is not an individual problem.”
Lipinski explained that both her and Kent understand the difficulties involved for victims when sharing their stories of sexual assault.
“We're so proud of our clients for finding the strength to come forward — many were scared to for a variety of reasons,” Lipinski said, noting that she and Kent are “happy to stand hand in hand” with the plaintiffs in their case against Massage Envy.
Read the complaint against Massage Envy filed in Palm Beach County Circuit Court:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/18/1b/6bd668a742d2b7c52a213921ac7b/bucciero-gorwitz-cid-767x633.jpg)
Florida Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss in $150M Plane Crash Lawsuit Involving Flow La Movie
3 minute read![Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will Heir Cut: Florida Appellate Court Backs Garth Reeves' Will](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1a/5a/54f1609943889700618e7b8cd244/shaw-wilder-robinson-767x633.jpg)
![How to Frustrate a Federal Judge in the Southern District of Florida How to Frustrate a Federal Judge in the Southern District of Florida](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailybusinessreview/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2022/01/University-of-Miami-767x633-1.jpg)
How to Frustrate a Federal Judge in the Southern District of Florida
4 minute read![Million-Dollar Verdict: Miami Jury Sides With Small Business Million-Dollar Verdict: Miami Jury Sides With Small Business](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/12/f1/019a447f4e138cbae08c12596085/aiello-bennett-kreines.jpg)
Million-Dollar Verdict: Miami Jury Sides With Small Business
Trending Stories
- 1DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 2Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers and Clients Left 'Relying on the Governments to Sort This Out'
- 5Willkie Adds Five-Lawyer Team From Quinn Emanuel in Germany
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250