Former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stephen Millan. Courtesy photoJQC Drops Case Against Former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stephen Millan
The JQC had accused Stephen Millan of using racial slurs to describe black defendants in his courtroom.
August 27, 2018 at 12:17 PM
3 minute read
Former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stephen Thomas Millan is no longer in hot water with the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission after vacating the bench during an ethics probe.
The JQC, which investigates alleged misconduct by Florida state judges, voluntarily dismissed its ethics case after Millan's Aug. 3 resignation from office. The move relies on Rule 9.35(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which allows the group to drop formal charges if a judge steps down from his post.
Click here to read the JQC's charges against Millan
Controversy had swirled around Millan for several months over charges he used the derogatory term “moolie” to describe black defendants in off-the-record conversations with attorneys, and later referred to black witnesses and family members in his courtroom as “thugs.”
“Once in your chambers you instructed your bailiff to go retrieve your wallet from the courtroom because, 'I don't trust it in there with those thugs,'” the JQC's May 21 complaint stated.
Millan didn't deny making the statements but insisted he meant no offense.
Though all charges have been dropped, Millan's judicial career is over. In order for the charges to be dropped, Millan had to agree never to seek further judicial office or senior judge status again.
Millan served in the Miami-Dade's children's court division, according to the Eleventh Circuit's website. He rose to the bench after being elected in 2014 for a six-year term beginning January 2015.
Millan's attorney, David Rothman of Rothman & Associates in Miami, declined to comment on the case.
The decision mirrors a recent move by the JQC to drop charges against former Broward judge John Contini, who resigned amid allegations he faked his docket to avoid work.
Former Broward judge John Contini. Photo: Melanie Bell/ALMJQC Drops Charges Against Former Broward Judge John Contini
Three ethics cases against South Florida jurists remain pending before the JQC.
Miami-Dade County Court Judge Maria Ortiz is accused of accepting free hotel stays offered to her husband, former director of Miami Beach's building department, while Palm Beach County Court Judge Dana Marie Santino is accused of implementing unsavory advertising tactics against her opponent in the 2016 judicial election.
Miami-Dade County Court Judge Deborah White-Labora allegedly violated the Code of Judicial Conduct by writing a character reference letter in support of a defendant before his sentencing.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Historic Flooding, Power Outages and Debris From Hurricane Milton Forced Tampa Law Firms to Go Remote
3 minute read
Sullivan & Cromwell Dismissed as Defendant in Lawsuit from FTX Investors
Eleventh Circuit Rules for Moms for Liberty in Free Speech Case Against School Board
4 minute read
Employee's Alleged Action Lands Marriott in Court for Defamation, Negligence
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
