Morgan & Morgan Attorneys Set to File First Lawsuit Over Mass Shooting at Video Game Competition in Jacksonville
Morgan & Morgan attorneys Matt Morgan, Tim Moran and James Young represent a client who survived two bullet wounds. Their client participated in the "Madden NFL 19" video game competition in Jacksonville, Florida, where a gunman killed two people.
August 28, 2018 at 02:29 PM
5 minute read
|
Morgan & Morgan attorneys announced Tuesday that they would be filing the first lawsuit over Sunday's shooting in Jacksonville that killed three — including gunman David Katz — and left 11 people injured from the shots and chaos that ensued.
Speaking at a news conference at the firm's Jacksonville office, attorneys noted they were across the street from the site of the shooting at a video game tournament. Lawyers Tim Moran, Matt Morgan and James Young told reporters that Morgan & Morgan would be submitting its first claim in Florida state court later this week.
“We will be filing a negligent security lawsuit on behalf of several victims,” Morgan told reporters.
Watch Morgan & Morgan's press conference here.
In his opening remarks, Morgan repeatedly emphasized the need for business owners and event organizers to provide proper security to patrons, in light of multiple mass shootings in Florida and the United States.
The suits stem from the attack in which alleged shooter Katz, a 24-year-old competitive gamer from Baltimore, opened fire at Good Luck Have Fun Game Bar, a video game-themed spot in the back of Chicago Pizza restaurant. Katz killed two people before turning the gun on himself.
“It is a scary and terrifying time for Americans in this country. It seems like every time we turn on the news there's another reporting of a mass shooting, and it can almost make it so that you don't want to leave your house. But Americans are resilient. We don't run and hide, we get up and fight,” Morgan said. “It is time for event organizers to step up their game when it comes to security.”
Related: Orlando Shooting Spawns Negligent-Security Queries
“Business as usual on the security front will no longer be tolerated by Americans,” Morgan reiterated. “We are going to demand more. We must demand more.”
According to Morgan, there were several reasons for the parties hosting the “Madden NFL 19″ tournament at the GLHF (Good Luck Have Fun) Bar to take extra precautions to ensure the safety of attendees: recent violence in the area, including a January 2017 shooting at Jacksonville Landing, as well as a bullet recently striking the Morgan & Morgan office.
“Our building was shot two months ago,” he said. “The duct tape on the shattered window remains.”
Morgan said the inherently competitive nature of video game tournaments warrants extensive precautionary measures. ”These are the types of events that have to have the highest level of security. Tensions run high at these events and this community knows that security at these events is a paramount concern.”
During the press conference's question-and-answer session, Morgan's colleague, Moran, told reporters that the firm was still considering all potentially liable parties and would not be naming any defendants at this time. Furthermore, none of the attorneys would specifically say how many clients they were representing at this time.
“Every hour that ticks by there's more people that are calling us,” Morgan said. “Every time there's a mass shooting in Florida we get contacted by victims and families of victims. This is the first case that we have gotten involved in as a law firm.”
Observers expect more litigation.
According to West Palm Beach attorney Justus Reid, partner with the Reid Burman Lebedeker firm, it is likely that lawsuits will be filed on grounds besides negligent security.
“It'll be personal injury for those that were not killed, and wrongful death actions brought by the parents and/or partners of the people that were killed,” Reid told the Daily Business Review.
The board-certified trial attorney said it was “a recipe for disaster” to hold such an event with no security.
“The organizers of this are going to be looking for a good lawyer to defend them because they're going to get sued and the pizza place will get sued,” he said.
Morgan & Morgan is a personal injury law firm with offices around the country, including 24 in Florida alone. It was among the first firms to file suit in the wake of the March 2018 FIU bridge collapse, which killed six.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Hit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 2New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 3Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 4'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 5Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250