Who's No. 2 and Legal Battles: The Week in Florida Politics
The surprising outcome of Florida's gubernatorial primary election has put a lot of attention and focus on the Republican and Democratic winners now heading on to the November election.
September 04, 2018 at 11:24 AM
4 minute read
Florida's 2018 midterm election is one of the most important in years. The governor's office and all three Cabinet seats are on the ballot; Republican Gov. Rick Scott is challenging three-term Democratic U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson; several congressional seats will be competitive; and Floridians will vote on several proposed constitutional amendments. The following are items of political interest from the past week:
WHO'S NO 2?
The surprising outcome of Florida's gubernatorial primary election has put a lot of attention and focus on the Republican and Democratic winners now heading on to the November election.
But while U.S. Rep. Ron DeSantis and Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum are making television appearances and picking up money they also have a looming deadline to contend with.
Florida election law requires Gillum and DeSantis to pick a running mate by Sept. 6.
In recent years, there has been much debate over whether the job of lieutenant governor is really needed especially since the job doesn't have any defined duties. After Lieutenant Gov. Jennifer Carroll abruptly resigned in March 2013, Gov. Rick Scott didn't pick a replacement until nearly a year later.
Scott tapped former legislator Carlos Lopez-Cantera for the post just months before he sought a second term in office. But while Lopez-Cantera played a role in helping Scott push through his legislative priorities during his re-election year, he became less and less visible once Scott was sworn into a second term.
Guessing who DeSantis or Gillum will pick has quickly become the favorite parlor game of Tallahassee's insiders who are throwing out the names of various legislators and local officials — many of whom have limited name identity outside of their local areas.
In most elections, the choice has little bearing on the ultimate outcome, although there is speculation that Jeb Bush's decision to choose Tom Feeney as his lieutenant governor in 1994 may have led to his narrow defeat.
AMENDMENT LEGAL BATTLES RAGE ON
There were supposed to be 13 amendments on this year's ballot, but how many of those amendments voters will get to act on remains caught up in legal limbo.
This past Monday Circuit Judge Karen Gievers tossed off the ballot Amendment 6 because she ruled that the measure is misleading and does not fully tell voters what it does.
The measure, known as Amendment 6 or Marsy's Law, was put on the ballot earlier this year by the state's Constitution Revision Commission. The commission meets every 20 years and has the power to place amendments directly before voters. They must be approved by 60 percent of voters in order to pass.
Amendment 6 would spell out crime victims' rights, including protections from harassment, being informed of the accused's custody status, the right to be heard during criminal proceedings and the right to confer with prosecutors about any plea agreements. The proposal also puts in limits on how long appeals can take. The amendment, if passed, would also raise the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 75.
Gievers, however, agreed with those who challenged the amendment that it does not tell voters that it would also remove or modify rights of the accused in a criminal case.
The case over the amendment has been quickly kicked up to the Florida Supreme Court, which is now going to decide the fate of three separate amendments.
Justices held a hearing this past week on an amendment that if passed would ban betting on live dog racing. The high court is scheduled to hold hearings on the victims' right amendment and an amendment dealing with charter schools next week.
Gary Fineout and Brendan Farrington report for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250