New Trial Ordered for Mobster Convicted of Murdering Miami Subs Founder Gus Boulis
Suppression of cellphone tracking data led Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal to reverse the conviction of Anthony "Little Tony" Ferrari, one of three men convicted in the 2001 murder of South Florida businessman Gus Boulis. Ferrari's case has been remanded for a new trial.
September 05, 2018 at 04:15 PM
3 minute read
After being sentenced to life in prison in 2013, Anthony “Little Tony” Ferrari will once again have his day in court.
Ferrari, who was convicted along with Anthony “Big Tony” Moscatiello and James “Pudgy” Fiorillo in the 2001 murder of Miami Subs Grill founder Gus Boulis, will be receiving a new trial after Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal Wednesday reversed his conviction and remanded his case.
The appellate court ruled that Ferrari's Fourth Amendment rights had been violated with the introduction of historical cell site location information, or CSLI, that had been acquired without a warrant as evidence during his trial.
Citing the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Carpenter v. United States, which held that acquiring a person's historical cell phone location information constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, the panel ruled that the lower court had “erred in denying the motion to suppress” the information.
“The acquisition of this data without a warrant based on probable cause constituted an illegal search pursuant to the Fourth Amendment,” the opinion reads.
Read the appellate court ruling granting Anthony Ferrari a new trial:
Additionally, the appellate court ruled that a Richardson violation — referring to when one party fails to disclose the full scope of information acquired during discovery to the other — took place when state prosecutors neglected “to disclose the substance of a co-defendant's statements, as well as the existence of exculpatory statements by another witness.”
“The court also erred in concluding that the State had not committed a Richardson discovery violation,” the opinion reads. “Ferrari was prejudiced in his preparations for trial by these violations.”
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal recently made a similar ruling following an appeal from one of Ferrari's co-conspirators. According to a June 6 report in the Sun Sentinel, the high court also ordered a new trial for Moscatiello.
As noted in Wednesday's opinion, Boulis was believed to have been murdered over a business dispute concerning the sale of his SunCruz Casinos cruise line. His death generated a firestorm of controversy due in large part to his business dealings with controversial lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Related: Ex-Abramoff partner says mobster ordered “Gus” Boulis murder
Abramoff later pleaded guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud and served a prison sentence for his involvement in the SunCruz deal.
Neither of Ferrari's attorneys, West Palm Beach public defenders Carey Haughwout and Paul Edward Petillo, nor the state attorney general's office responded to requests for comment by press time.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250