New Trial Ordered for Mobster Convicted of Murdering Miami Subs Founder Gus Boulis
Suppression of cellphone tracking data led Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal to reverse the conviction of Anthony "Little Tony" Ferrari, one of three men convicted in the 2001 murder of South Florida businessman Gus Boulis. Ferrari's case has been remanded for a new trial.
September 05, 2018 at 04:15 PM
3 minute read
After being sentenced to life in prison in 2013, Anthony “Little Tony” Ferrari will once again have his day in court.
Ferrari, who was convicted along with Anthony “Big Tony” Moscatiello and James “Pudgy” Fiorillo in the 2001 murder of Miami Subs Grill founder Gus Boulis, will be receiving a new trial after Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal Wednesday reversed his conviction and remanded his case.
The appellate court ruled that Ferrari's Fourth Amendment rights had been violated with the introduction of historical cell site location information, or CSLI, that had been acquired without a warrant as evidence during his trial.
Citing the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Carpenter v. United States, which held that acquiring a person's historical cell phone location information constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, the panel ruled that the lower court had “erred in denying the motion to suppress” the information.
“The acquisition of this data without a warrant based on probable cause constituted an illegal search pursuant to the Fourth Amendment,” the opinion reads.
Read the appellate court ruling granting Anthony Ferrari a new trial:
Additionally, the appellate court ruled that a Richardson violation — referring to when one party fails to disclose the full scope of information acquired during discovery to the other — took place when state prosecutors neglected “to disclose the substance of a co-defendant's statements, as well as the existence of exculpatory statements by another witness.”
“The court also erred in concluding that the State had not committed a Richardson discovery violation,” the opinion reads. “Ferrari was prejudiced in his preparations for trial by these violations.”
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal recently made a similar ruling following an appeal from one of Ferrari's co-conspirators. According to a June 6 report in the Sun Sentinel, the high court also ordered a new trial for Moscatiello.
As noted in Wednesday's opinion, Boulis was believed to have been murdered over a business dispute concerning the sale of his SunCruz Casinos cruise line. His death generated a firestorm of controversy due in large part to his business dealings with controversial lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Related: Ex-Abramoff partner says mobster ordered “Gus” Boulis murder
Abramoff later pleaded guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud and served a prison sentence for his involvement in the SunCruz deal.
Neither of Ferrari's attorneys, West Palm Beach public defenders Carey Haughwout and Paul Edward Petillo, nor the state attorney general's office responded to requests for comment by press time.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250