Bad-Blood Bankruptcy: Litigation Balloons as South Florida Firm Appeals Court Orders Amid Family Fight
Moffa & Breuer make four filings appealing bankruptcy orders after intra-family fighting caused shareholders of Fisherman's Pier Inc. to lose management rights and be replaced by a trustee at Kapila & Co. Kapila joined forces with one shareholder, leaving Moffa out of the equation.
September 10, 2018 at 03:04 PM
6 minute read
Plantation-based law firm Moffa & Breuer has filed four separate motions appealing bankruptcy court orders, arguing against a joint plan that was approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray on Aug. 7 and in favor of a “better” plan filed by Moffa's client.
Two of the appeals came from the firm and two were filed on behalf of J.J. Risell, a trust operated by attorney John A. Moffa, who represents Broward company Fisherman's Pier Inc.
The parties are squabbling over whether the court should have confirmed the plan, whether Moffa & Breuer can represent the trust, and whether it's entitled to fees for its representation of the debtor in possesion.
Though all creditors have now been paid, the appeals are the latest move in a lengthy string of filings in litigation over family infighting.
Brothers Spiro and Elias Marchelos were joint owners of Fisherman's Pier Inc., which controlled a fishing pier at Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, and various restaurants.
Things turned sour on Apr. 16, 2014, when Elias Marchelos suffered a stroke and was unable to continue running the business, so a new shareholder entered the arena. His wife, Martha Marchelos, took over as joint shareholder, and from there began a yearslong battle with brother-in-law Spiro Marchelos.
“There's a lot of bad blood between Elias' power of attorney and Elias' brother. That was a problem that started years ago, but I tried not to have that affect what we did for the company and what we did for Elias,” Moffa said.
According to Glenn J. Waldman of Waldman Trigoboff Hildebrandt & Calnan in Fort Lauderdale, who took care of all state court litigation in the case, “The issue was mainly that (Martha) disagreed with the manner and method by which Spiro was managing the affairs of the business.”
A bitter ownership battle ensued, and the pier was shut down at one point.
Waldman entered the scene in December 2015 and made a successful attempt to enforce a settlement agreement between the shareholders, after Martha, acting as Elias' power of attorney, reneged.
In January 2016, Broward County Court Chief Judge Jack Tuter enforced the agreement, which confirmed Spiro Marchelos' co-ownership and also stated that he had the right and authority to act as the president of the company.
According to Moffa, “At that point, there not only were fights between shareholders, there was also a ballooning mortgage, some properties that were owned by both shareholders that weren't paying fair market rent, and there weren't commercially viable leases that a bank could look at to lend money against these properties.”
Moffa also alluded to the existence of an affidavit that allegedly shows shareholder Elias Marchelos didn't deposit all the money his company received into his bank account.
“I wanted accountability for the cash at the pier, which we don't have any control over at this point,” Moffa said.
In October 2017, Fisherman's Pier Inc. filed for bankruptcy, and in walked bankruptcy attorney Thomas R. Lehman of Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider & Grossman in Miami.
Lehman represents Spiro Marchelos, who argued that the Chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed without his permission.
“Martha Marchelos had filed it without proper corporate authority, because a Chapter 11 bankruptcy voluntary petition cannot be filed by a corporation unless the president who signs the petition is authorized by the company,” Lehman said.
Lehman filed an emergency motion.
“However, in the interim there were a number of hearings in which it became clear to the judge that the case was a shareholder dispute, that there was a fight,” Lehman said.
This led to the appointment of a trustee on Dec. 14, Soneet Kapila of Kapila & Co., who acted as manager of Fisherman's Pier while the case traveled through bankruptcy court.
“That changed the entire complexion of the case, as it meant there was somebody there to build a case. Now, we had fighting shareholders, neither of whom were in management,” Lehman said.
Trustee Kapila's attorney Chad P. Pugatch, of Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen in Fort Lauderdale, teamed up with Spiro Marchelos to create the joint reorganization plan, which was recently approved.
Despite the fighting, Pugatch felt the case was “very successful.”
“I think the trustee did a great job of taking a very bad situation, where these shareholders had been fighting for years and ended up with litigation that spilled over into bankruptcy court, and figuring out which was the best way to approach it, teaming up with one shareholder. We ended up confirming a plan that pays all creditors in full and basically restores the company to a situation where it can get out of bankruptcy and be profitable again,” Pugatch said.
But the way Moffa sees it, his client's plan would have done “everything that their plan did, except we were also going to infuse money.”
“What their plan did that I don't think is fair and equitable is their plain makes the one shareholder the sole manager the sole manager, and gives the other shareholder no say in how the property is run. We lost where Spiro gained,” Moffa said.
Either way, Waldman sees this case as a lesson to family business owners.
“Intra-family disputes are far too commonplace and often draw an interest,” he said. “Because they do afford a lesson learned as to how even family members who are in business together need to document their business affairs in advance of a potential dispute.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250