Settlement Reached in Litigation Over Controversial Fashion Mall Project in Broward
The settlement marks the end of an extended conflict between parties over the failed endeavor to transform the Plantation property into a live-work-play community called 321 North.
September 11, 2018 at 01:57 PM
6 minute read
After several years of litigation, contentious hearings and unexpected twists, a settlement has been reached between various parties in the protracted conflict concerning the failed redevelopment of the Fashion Mall in Plantation.
The settlement dismisses all complaints brought by the parties against one another, including a $48 million lawsuit by the bankruptcy estate against an investor and several companies. It also enables Chinese investor Wei Chen to retain custody of a $1 million flower shop holding that the trustee had sought in legal proceedings.
The case appeared headed for resolution in the last two months.
On July 26 U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John K. Olson approved the terms of a settlement agreement between bankruptcy trustee Kenneth A. Welt, and feuding former business partners — Chen, his affiliated parties, and their opponent, Chinese businessman Zhen Zeng Du and his Tangshan Ganglu Iron & Steel Co.
By Aug. 16, Olson had also ordered the dismissal of another piece of the litigation: Welt's adversary proceedings against a company called Jin Zhi Star, for which Chen had served as an officer and shareholder.
Welt, Chen, Du and their respective affiliates were all locked in entangling lawsuits against one another over the failed venture to redevelop the Fashion Mall. The mall had opened in 1988 but was closed after significant damage from Hurricane Wilma in 2005.
Du and Chen had intended to transform the site into a live-work-play community called 321 North, with storefronts, a high-rise condominium, a branded hotel and more.
With $300 million allegedly invested into the project, tensions rose between the partners and the venture fell apart. Chen was meant to oversee the U.S. companies involved in the project while Du remained in China. But Du accused Chen of misappropriating millions of dollars.
Welt entered the picture as a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee. In 2015 he successfully moved to halt the Chapter 11 reorganization, saying the estate would recover more by selling the former mall through competitive bidding.
The property was sold in a bankruptcy auction on April 2015 for $37.7 million. Welt then filed an adversary complaint in August 2016 to recover more than $9 million that Chen allegedly diverted from the project.
Read the complaint filed by Kenneth Welt against Wei Chen:
Attorneys on both sides say their clients are relieved to move beyond years of fighting.
“Good meditations mean that nobody is thrilled to death, but he was satisfied and happy that a fair result came out of it,” said Jerry M. Markowitz, one of the attorneys representing Chen. Markowitz, a managing partner at Markowitz Ringel Trusty + Hartog in Miami, added that the mediator, attorney Russell M. Blain, “did a fantastic job in bringing everyone together,” especially considering the significant period of animosity between the various parties.
Welt's attorney, Glenn D. Moses of Genovese Joblove & Battista, also seemed pleased with the outcome.
“The settlement resulted in the elimination of over $11.5 million in claims, ended contentious litigation, and paved the way for a 100 percent distribution to the unsecured creditors in two of the debtor estates and a 33 percent distribution, to date, in the third,” Moses said. “The trustee recently distributed over $8.5 million to creditors and expects to make a further distribution in short order.”
“Full payment to unsecured creditors is a rare event in a bankruptcy case, and therefore the trustee is proud of the results he and his professionals obtained thus far,” Moses added. ”The trustee is evaluating one remaining cause of action which may result in further funds being made available for creditors, which will be addressed in the very near future.”
Scott A. Underwood, a Tampa shareholder with Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, represented Chen's Jin Zhi Star company. The company had been accused of facilitating the fraudulent transfer of millions of dollars. Underwood shares both Markowitz and Moses' satisfaction with the approved settlement.
“My client was a much smaller entity with far less funds than its adversary, Ganglu Iron & Steel, and had substantially less litigation funds at its disposal. In light of that reality, and the depleting funds being used in the case to fund litigation by the trustee, I feel the settlement was a very positive result for my client,” Underwood told the Daily Business Review. “Because the Fashion Mall now has new ownership, I suspect this litigation will not continue to impact the Fashion Mall or its development.”
Blank Rome partner Richard E. Berman and associate Alen H. Hsu represented Chen and several of his companies and associated parties. They said their client was particularly pleased that he was able to keep the flower shop, a small property situated in front of the Fashion Mall and valued at nearly $1 million. Chen was also happy to see the claims dismissed as millions of dollars were at stake.
“[Chen] is pleased with the result of the settlement… even though he waived his claims of $900,000, he got to keep the flower shop,” Hsu said. “He's pleased that the case is over. It's unfortunate that it took so long and was so costly, but the result is something that he's happy with.”
Related stories:
Real Estate Developer Latest to Be Sued Over Doomed Fashion Mall
Berger Singerman Steers $37.7M Auction Bid for Plantation's Fashion Mall
Would-Be Fashion Mall Developer on China's Most Wanted List
Read Judge Olson's order dismissing the suit against Jin Zhi Star:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAutomaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Florida Retention Ponds Scrutinized in Lawsuit After Latest Child Drowning
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250