Attorneys for Embattled Chinese Businessman Speak on Fashion Mall Settlement
Peter Russin and Daniel Gonzalez of Miami firm Meland Russin and Budwick say their client, Zeng Zheng Du, was in a "zero-sum game" that led him to settle the litigation.
September 12, 2018 at 03:54 PM
3 minute read
Miami attorneys representing the largest investor in the failed effort to convert a Plantation property into a lavish live-work-play community are speaking out following the approval of a settlement agreement between the involved parties.
Related: Settlement Reached in Litigation Over Controversial Fashion Mall Project in Broward
According to Peter Russin and Daniel Gonzalez, who represented Tangshan Ganglu Iron & Steel and its owner Zeng Zheng Du, their clients are pleased with the outcome of the settlement, even if it arrived out of financial necessity.
“Tangshan Ganglu Iron & Steel was the major stakeholder in the bankruptcy case,” said Russin, who is a partner at Meland Russin and Budwick alongside Gonzalez. Russin notes that the company was the largest creditor owed, “having invested in excess of $100 million” in the failed endeavor. As such, it was the goal of Zeng and his company to “maximize its return on those funds,” even as money was dwindling from the $37.7 million sale of the property in April 2015.
Russin told the Daily Business Review the bills were quickly stacking up for the litigating factions, hastening the need for mediation and an eventual settlement.
Read the settlement agreement concerning the former Fashion Mall site:
“The trustee was spending a great deal of money on attorney fees. My client was spending a great deal of money on attorney fees, and we presume Wei Chen was racking up bills from attorney fees,” Russin said, adding that the mediation and settlement were “driven by preservation of assets” on all sides.”
Ganglu and Du describing his client's believed their claims against Chen were “very strong,” but felt they weren't going to produce a meaningful recovery.
“It was a simple calculation, a zero-sum game,” Russin said.
Attorneys on both sides say their clients are relieved to move beyond years of fighting.
“Good meditations mean that nobody is thrilled to death, but he was satisfied and happy that a fair result came out of it,” Jerry M. Markowitz, one of the attorneys representing Chen, said.
Du and his attorneys agreed in the settlement to pay Jin Zhi Star, a company owned by Chen, what Russin refers to as “nuisance value money” in order to help bring the litigation to a close. But the businessman isn't leaving empty handed.
“The ultimate effect of the settlement is that our client will get over 90 percent of the money distributed from the trustee,” Gonzalez said.
Russin emphasized that the litigation was ultimately settled in large part because long-term lawsuits are expensive and accumulated costs “often ends up dictating the result.”
“But still the result was acceptable to our client,” Russin said. “And our client will accept well in excess of 90 percent of the funds.”
Related stories:
Settlement Reached in Litigation Over Controversial Fashion Mall Project in Broward
Real Estate Developer Latest to Be Sued Over Doomed Fashion Mall
Berger Singerman Steers $37.7M Auction Bid for Plantation's Fashion Mall
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAutomaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Florida Retention Ponds Scrutinized in Lawsuit After Latest Child Drowning
Trending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250