Harassment Case to Proceed Against Alleged Bottom-Groping Broward School Principal
Riverland Elementary principal Oslay Gil is alleged to have made inappropriate sexual comments and touched school guidance counselor Cherellda Branch-McKenzie's behind "on multiple ocassions" and said, "Oh, I'm sorry, but it felt good!"
September 14, 2018 at 04:02 PM
4 minute read
A sexual harassment case against the Broward County School Board that makes more than 20 allegations against Principal Oslay Gil of Riverland Elementary fits the criteria of a hostile work environment harassment claim, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Gil is accused of a host of misconduct against school guidance counselor Cherellda Branch-McKenzie, including placing his fingers on her lips “if he thought she was talking too loud,” and telling her, “Girl, you look good. I sure would like to see what that's like. I know I can have THAT!”
The move reversed a trial court ruling that stated Gil's alleged behavior was not “pervasive” enough, but affirmed the dismissal of four other counts against the school board — unlawful retaliation and negligent hiring, supervision and retention.
According to the original complaint filed Sept. 19, 2014, Gil allegedly touched Branch-McKenzie's buttocks, then said, “Oh, I'm sorry, but it felt good!”
Click here to read the complaint.
In hindsight, Gil is reported to have said that touching Branch-McKenzie's bottom was a mistake, but “a good mistake.”
Gil is also accused of touching Branch-McKenzie's back and hair, despite her objections. The incident was overheard by a coworker, who claimed Gil said Branch-McKenzie was “like a mango … You can't just have one.”
The school board had moved for summary judgment, arguing that regardless of whether the alleged events occurred, they weren't “pervasive” enough to support the plaintiff's claim.
Gil has denied all allegations against him, and in his deposition said the pair had “a good relationship.”
Read Principal Oslay Gil's Deposition transcripts:
|But this wasn't Gil's first harassment complaint.
According to court documents, Gil was transferred to Riverland after similar complaints from employees at his previous school. Gil was placed on administrative leave with pay for a year, then suspended for 10 days and moved to Riverland.
“He's basically just picked up where he left off,” said Branch-McKenzie's attorney, Melissa Mihok of CPLS Litigation in Orlando. “I have 20 different people at the present school or the school he was at previously that have either witnessed him sexually harass people, or have been sexually harassed.”
Gil's lawyers, Debra Potter Kaluber and Kenneth J. Miller of Haliczer, Pettis & Scwamm in Fort Lauderdale did not respond to requests for comment.
Read the court opinion:
|The opinion, written by Fourth DCA Judge Burton C. Conner on behalf of a panel consisting of Judges Robert M. Gross and Mark M. Klingensmith, states that witnesses at Riverland have claimed Oslay repeatedly referred to McKenzie as his “boo.”
The Pact
Branch-McKenzie reported the alleged behavior to the school board's equal employment opportunity office, after which point she dodged Gil at all costs, according to her attorney.
“She was afraid to go to staff meetings, so she would basically be insubordinate by not going to meetings because she was trying to avoid Gil at all times,” Mihok said.
Branch-McKenzie also asked a co-worker, another alleged victim, for help.
“They made a pact to never leave themselves alone with him,” Mihok said.
According to Mihok, Branch-McKenzie has since transferred to a guidance counselor position at another school, but before she left, Gil “ordered her to spend half of her time acting as a PE teacher while still completing her duties as a guidance counselor,even though she had a medical issue with her knee.”
Branch-McKenzie, who'd worked at the school since 1994, also claimed that Gil thwarted her attempt to become assistant principal.
“Anytime anybody would call and ask for a reference he would give her a bad reference,” Mihok said.
Mihok said her client is pleased with the ruling.
“We're very confident that a jury will see this for what it is and that's blatant sexual harassment that shouldn't be tolerated, especially in the school system, but anywhere,” Mihok said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250