Harassment Case to Proceed Against Alleged Bottom-Groping Broward School Principal
Riverland Elementary principal Oslay Gil is alleged to have made inappropriate sexual comments and touched school guidance counselor Cherellda Branch-McKenzie's behind "on multiple ocassions" and said, "Oh, I'm sorry, but it felt good!"
September 14, 2018 at 04:02 PM
4 minute read
A sexual harassment case against the Broward County School Board that makes more than 20 allegations against Principal Oslay Gil of Riverland Elementary fits the criteria of a hostile work environment harassment claim, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Gil is accused of a host of misconduct against school guidance counselor Cherellda Branch-McKenzie, including placing his fingers on her lips “if he thought she was talking too loud,” and telling her, “Girl, you look good. I sure would like to see what that's like. I know I can have THAT!”
The move reversed a trial court ruling that stated Gil's alleged behavior was not “pervasive” enough, but affirmed the dismissal of four other counts against the school board — unlawful retaliation and negligent hiring, supervision and retention.
According to the original complaint filed Sept. 19, 2014, Gil allegedly touched Branch-McKenzie's buttocks, then said, “Oh, I'm sorry, but it felt good!”
Click here to read the complaint.
In hindsight, Gil is reported to have said that touching Branch-McKenzie's bottom was a mistake, but “a good mistake.”
Gil is also accused of touching Branch-McKenzie's back and hair, despite her objections. The incident was overheard by a coworker, who claimed Gil said Branch-McKenzie was “like a mango … You can't just have one.”
The school board had moved for summary judgment, arguing that regardless of whether the alleged events occurred, they weren't “pervasive” enough to support the plaintiff's claim.
Gil has denied all allegations against him, and in his deposition said the pair had “a good relationship.”
Read Principal Oslay Gil's Deposition transcripts:
But this wasn't Gil's first harassment complaint.
According to court documents, Gil was transferred to Riverland after similar complaints from employees at his previous school. Gil was placed on administrative leave with pay for a year, then suspended for 10 days and moved to Riverland.
“He's basically just picked up where he left off,” said Branch-McKenzie's attorney, Melissa Mihok of CPLS Litigation in Orlando. “I have 20 different people at the present school or the school he was at previously that have either witnessed him sexually harass people, or have been sexually harassed.”
Gil's lawyers, Debra Potter Kaluber and Kenneth J. Miller of Haliczer, Pettis & Scwamm in Fort Lauderdale did not respond to requests for comment.
Read the court opinion:
The opinion, written by Fourth DCA Judge Burton C. Conner on behalf of a panel consisting of Judges Robert M. Gross and Mark M. Klingensmith, states that witnesses at Riverland have claimed Oslay repeatedly referred to McKenzie as his “boo.”
The Pact
Branch-McKenzie reported the alleged behavior to the school board's equal employment opportunity office, after which point she dodged Gil at all costs, according to her attorney.
“She was afraid to go to staff meetings, so she would basically be insubordinate by not going to meetings because she was trying to avoid Gil at all times,” Mihok said.
Branch-McKenzie also asked a co-worker, another alleged victim, for help.
“They made a pact to never leave themselves alone with him,” Mihok said.
According to Mihok, Branch-McKenzie has since transferred to a guidance counselor position at another school, but before she left, Gil “ordered her to spend half of her time acting as a PE teacher while still completing her duties as a guidance counselor,even though she had a medical issue with her knee.”
Branch-McKenzie, who'd worked at the school since 1994, also claimed that Gil thwarted her attempt to become assistant principal.
“Anytime anybody would call and ask for a reference he would give her a bad reference,” Mihok said.
Mihok said her client is pleased with the ruling.
“We're very confident that a jury will see this for what it is and that's blatant sexual harassment that shouldn't be tolerated, especially in the school system, but anywhere,” Mihok said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 2$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 3'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
- 4Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
- 5Netflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250