UCF Improperly Used $38 Million on Building Project
UCF President Dale Whittaker told the state university system's Board of Governors that the school has replenished the state money, while taking steps to investigate the problem and prevent similar occurrences in the future.
September 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM
5 minute read
The University of Central Florida's chief financial officer stepped down after an audit revealed the school improperly used $38 million in state funding to construct a campus building.
UCF President Dale Whittaker told the state university system's Board of Governors on Thursday that the school has replenished the state money, while taking steps to investigate the problem and prevent similar occurrences in the future.
The use of state operating funds to build the 137,000-square-foot Trevor Colbourn Hall, which opened this semester at UCF, was in violation of state policy that restricts that money to activities like instruction, research, libraries, student services or maintenance.
The improper use of the funds is the first major leadership test for Whittaker, who took over Florida's largest state university in July. And the issue could have ramifications for the entire university-system budget, as it will provide fodder for lawmakers who have been skeptical about the universities' control of large reserve funds.
It drew the immediate ire of Board of Governors members, who oversee the 12-school system.
“This is a serious breach of trust. And trust is something that is earned. So we've got a journey ahead to earn back that trust,” Syd Kitson, chairman of the board's budget committee, told Whittaker.
“It's about our trust. And when something like this goes off the tracks, it destroys the trust of the whole system,” said Ned Lautenbach, chairman of the board.
He and Kitson said the incident may impact the university-system budget process.
“We're going to have a more difficult time, as we should, with the Legislature, making sure we know what the hell we're doing here and we're on top of things,” Lautenbach said. “I am personally very disappointed in this.”
Whittaker said he first learned about the problem last month when the Florida Auditor General's Office alerted the school to its discovery during an audit that the $38 million in construction funding for Colbourn Hall violated state policy.
The building project, which dated back to at least 2014, and funding were under the control of William Merck, the UCF chief financial officer and vice president for administration and finance.
After the auditor's notification, Whittaker said Merck took “immediate and full responsibility” for the misuse of the money. He said he accepted Merck's decision to retire and removed any “fiduciary” oversight from the vice president, although he remained at the school.
Following Whittaker's report to the Board of Governors, which was meeting Thursday in Sarasota, the school announced Merck had left his job. He was paid $342,348 a year.
After he learned about the problem, Whittaker said he developed a plan to replace the money with appropriate funding the university was holding in various reserves. The replacement funds included $36.7 million from the university's “auxiliary funds,” including investment earnings, and $950,000 from concession funds.
The replenishment plan was approved by UCF's board of trustees last week in an emergency meeting.
“It was not easy pooling together multiple sources of funds, but I wanted to immediately correct the funding situation at one time, not phased over multiple years,” Whittaker told the Board of Governors. “At the same time, I directed our team to ensure students are not adversely affected by these financial moves.”
He also instituted a policy for future building projects that would require certification from multiple administrators, including the president and general counsel, that funding is “appropriate for that purpose.”
UCF has also hired the Atlanta law firm of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner to conduct an independent investigation of the incident, looking at issues such as how other projects may have been funded and how many people were aware of how the Colbourn Hall project was being financed.
“Most importantly, it's evident that the controls governing how decisions were made at the institutional level broke down, and clear information about funding sources was not transparently shared,” Whittaker said.
He said the independent review would “examine our processes, delegations of authority, procedures and personnel.”
Whittaker said the school may take further steps once it receives the law firm's report.
Whittaker began his remarks to the Board of Governors by saying he wanted to address “completely and transparently how UCF has fallen short of expectations,” while outlining the steps the school is taking to prevent future incidents.
“The bottom line is this: In my presidency, something like this will never happen,” he said.
In addition to questions for Whittaker, the Board of Governors members raised questions about the role of the UCF board of trustees, which has oversight over the president and spending at the university.
Marcos Marchena, chairman of the UCF board, said he was involved in the financing decisions for Colbourn Hall, which originally involved a plan to renovate the former Colbourn Hall, one of the oldest facilities on campus. Over several years, the renovation project evolved into a plan to build a separate new building, after officials learned it would be more cost-effective.
Marchena said at each step of the way “representations were very clear that we had the necessary funds and the appropriate funds.”
“Looking back, I wish I had asked that extra question. But we asked a lot of questions. We were misled. And we're going to take steps, as President Whittaker said, to try to make sure that it doesn't happen again,” he told the Board of Governors.
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMediating Community Association Disputes: Tips for Attorneys, and Their Clients
6 minute readCole, Scott & Kissane Keeps Transitioning More Resources Into Construction As Tort Reform Changes Loom
4 minute readCheap Lumber, Stronger Hurricanes—Perfect Storm for the Strained Florida Insurance Market
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Media Law Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump and Carr’s FCC
- 2Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 3Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 4Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 5People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250