Do Schools Have an Increased Responsibility to Prevent Violence?
Basic rules, codes of conduct and discipline, are areas in which we accept that our schools will act with authority as surrogates for the benefit of our children. Both to maximize the learning taking place, but also the very safety of our children.
September 17, 2018 at 09:45 AM
4 minute read
Our schools have always served as guardians of our children from drop-off to the bell at the end of the day. Historically, our focus and concerns as parents have been limited to grades, conduct, extracurricular clubs and sports. However, the common law doctrine of in loco parentis, latin for “in place of the parents” is an ancient concept dating to at least the 18th century. It recognizes that in order to effectuate the meaningful education and training of our children, teachers and administrators must be given some powers over their charges traditionally reserved solely for the parents of those children.
Basic rules, codes of conduct and discipline, are areas in which we accept that our schools will act with authority as surrogates for the benefit of our children. Both to maximize the learning taking place, but also the very safety of our children. These responsibilities may seem to have changed in the aftermath of Columbine, Sandy Hook, Marjory Stoneman Douglas, and so many others, but they haven't; the essence of the schools' role as parent is very much the same. The difficulty of accomplishing this critical task, however, has increased dramatically. We now have the benefit of foreseeability, akin to a crystal ball, that has taught us over the past 20 years that somewhere soon, unless a major reprioritization of school safety occurs, that another mass casualty event will occur.
With the dread that this foreseeable crisis portends, however, is an opportunity to address it. As a society, we certainly do not accept our children to be unnecessarily harmed in their schools today any more than we would have accepted it prior to the proliferation of assault rifles and mass shootings that have already infected the learning environment in every school across the country at every age level. Schools everywhere are practicing “Code Red” drills as the new normal, in an effort to meet their continued obligations of protecting children as their own—in loco parentis. We know that such events are foreseeable, which is why (too few) additional resources are devoted to it.
One of the more significant evolutions in this effort has been the widening of the list of concerned individuals necessary to carry out this responsibility. Where in the past it may have been a local principal devising remedies intended to address singular problems with certain students or troubling patterns of conduct in one or two classrooms, now entire communities are beginning to play a major part in ensuring that a school's obligation to each and every child is met. This includes district and state level educators and administrators, as well as local, state and nationally elected lawmakers.
Nonprofit organizations, attorneys, doctors and law enforcement officials are coming together to help the schools meet their continued obligation of keeping our children safe. On behalf of the victims of several school murder victims, including two from Marjorie Stoneman Douglas in Parkland, our attorneys and our colleagues in the legal community have analyzed and dissected safety protocols in order to identify the weaknesses that have facilitated the preventable murders in schools—murders that would never have occurred if the schools were as vigilant with their responsibilities as we would be with our own children at home.
From the filing of lawsuits to force everyone involved in child safety to address weaknesses, to lobbying in state capitals and in Washington, D.C., we have continued to seek a deliberate, methodical, and funded system to give those standing in place of the parents all the resources they need to both teach our children, and keep them safe in the process.
In loco parentis, an age-old responsibility for those educating and caring for our children, has not changed one bit. The community of parents and leaders, however, is only expanding in order to ensure that the degree of difficulty in this task will never serve as an excuse to meeting the challenge. Failure is not an option, and we are all each other's keeper in the effort to ensure that our children can rely on the safety of their schools as surely as they would if they were in their own home, with their own parents looking after them.
Christopher Marlowe is a partner with The Haggard Law Firm in Coral Gables. He handles a wide array of cases including those involving negligent security, pool drowning, auto accident and wrongful death.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 20
- 2Saxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
- 3Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 4South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 5'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250