City Faces $137M Claim From Crocker Partners on Stalled Midtown Boca
Crocker Partners is planning to sue the city a second time over changes in redevelopment plans.
September 18, 2018 at 03:21 PM
5 minute read
Boca Raton could face as much as $137 million in damages on Crocker Partners LLC's claim that it lost property rights after the city scaled back redevelopment plans in an area where the developer purchased real estate.
The Boca Raton-based real estate investment and management firm plans to file a second lawsuit against the city over this issue. This time it will sue under the Bert J. Harris Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act, which authorizes damages for lost property values due to government takings.
The “Florida Legislature created the Bert Harris Act to allow landowners who have been mistreated by their municipalities, like we have, to seek damages from the municipalities,” said Angelo Bianco, Crocker managing partner.
The issue revolves around about 200 acres in the Midtown Boca district from Glades Road south to Town Center Road and from Interstate 95 west to St. Andrews Blvd. Crocker bought three properties totaling 64 acres in the area about three years ago keyed to redevelopment plans before the city switched course.
In 2010, the city approved planned mobility development designations for several areas, including Midtown and added the designations to its comprehensive plan, which guides growth, development, transportation and infrastructure, according to Crocker's first complaint filed May 22.
The crux of Crocker's argument is that the city was supposed to pass related zoning and land development regulations to reflect the planned mobility designations. But on Jan. 23, the City Council unanimously voted to postpone the rule change and voted 4-1 to approve a smaller plan, according to meeting minutes.
“We bought our property three years ago and figured that it would be just a matter of a few months, and it's turned out to be three years of inaction following by in January a decision by the city to delay the regulations adoptions indefinitely,” Bianco said.
Crocker owns Boca Center, a mixed-use development at 5150 Town Center Circle that includes office buildings and a 256-room Marriott; One Town Center, an 11-story office building at 1 Town Center Road and surrounding acreage; and The Plaza, a 10-story office building at 5355 Town Center Road.
Crocker hasn't disclosed any specific plans but intends to add residences to its office and retail properties to create a walkable village ”so that people who work in this area can live and play and walk to work and dining,” Bianco said. “This is really the way internationally that progressive cities are developing so that their residents can have a much higher quality of life.”
Crocker on April 10 formally notified the city of its Bert Harris claim to meet a 150-day pre-suit requirement.
The city said it hasn't received a Bert Harris lawsuit and that it responded to Crocker's April 10 notice.
In the response, the city argued Crocker's Bert Harris claim is deficient, speculative, not reasonable and not ripe. The city submitted its response Sept. 7 saying the deadline for its reply was Sept. 8.
The city maintained the city's failure to adopt the planned mobility development regulations was not actionable under Bert Harris. City comments refer to Plaza, which is a reference to CP Boca Plaza LLC, which is affiliated with Crocker and is the listed owner of The Plaza office building.
“The act creates a cause of action where a law, regulation or ordinance, as applied, inordinately burdens, restricts or limits a private property right,” wrote Daniel Abbott, the city's outside attorney and a Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman member. “Plaza does not claim that the city has taken an action that takes away or limits its private property rights (or development rights), but rather that the City Council elected not to adopt as requested by Plaza an ordinance to create new development rights for the subject property.”
Crocker's first lawsuit sought declaratory relief. The city's motion to dismiss argued it could — but is not required to — adopt land development regulations that reflect the planned mobility designation. The city also said its land development regulations are consistent with its comprehensive plan, requiring no further action.
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Howard Coates Jr. on Aug. 27 granted the city's motion to dismiss the first count of Crocker's lawsuit but denied the motion to dismiss the second count challenging the constitutionality of draft ordinances that would require a master plan for the entire Midtown district.
Bianco also complained city records don't reflect who is making decisions and how they are being made in this case.
“As far as we can see there's no public record discussing any of these issues,” he said. “There's no conversations with anyone. We were like, 'Who is making these decisions?'”
City communications and marketing manager Chrissy Gibson said because the city so far only has received the Bert Harris notice, an executive session cannot be held as the city hasn't been sued on the matter.
As for the other pending lawsuit, the Gibson pointed out that the City Council and attorneys discussed the matter July 24 in a private session. They are allowed to discuss pending lawsuits in private meetings out of the public's eye, but minutes of these meetings would become public once the lawsuit ends.
The $137 million claim is based on lost value from the proposed residential segment, Bianco said.
Weiss, Handler & Cornwell founding partner Henry Handler in Boca Raton filed the Bert Harris Act notices, and Handler, senior trial and appellate attorney William Berger and senior associate David Friedman filed the initial lawsuit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
- 4Battle for Top Talent Accelerates Amid Profit and Demand Surge
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250