Disbarment Recommended for Lawyer Stephen Rakusin Over 'Baseless' Lawsuit
The Florida Supreme Court will weigh in on a court-appointed referee's recommendation that Fort Lauderdale attorney Stephen Rakusin be disbarred for his role in a 'baseless lawsuit' disputing attorneys fees.
September 19, 2018 at 10:09 AM
4 minute read
Stephen Rakusin of the Rakusin Law Firm in Fort Lauderdale could lose his law license after court-appointed referee Palm Beach County Court Judge Paul Damico found him guilty of filing a sham pleading.
Rakusin filed the pleading on behalf of his client and former Broward Circuit Judge Laura Watson in May 2009.
Watson attempted to sue the Florida Bar lawyers and Judicial Qualifications Commission members who had a hand in her disbarment, but the case was later dismissed. She was removed from the bench in 2015 over ethical complaints and permanently disbarred in 2017 for her role in negotiating an undisclosed settlement during her time as an insurance litigator at Watson & Lenter.
Related: Former Broward Judge Laura Watson Disbarred; Five Attorneys Suspended
|
According to the referee's report, claims made in that case stemmed from a prior case in which Rakusin and Watson sued attorneys at Stewart Tilghman Fox Bianchi & Cain in Miami over the distribution of attorney's fees in a settlement agreement.
Watson “does nothing to show that the JQC investigative panel members' functions were not similar to the role of prosecutors, or that the defendants stepped outside their roles such that absolute immunity would not attach to that action,” U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke wrote at the time.
Damico's investigation of Rakusin's actions in the Watson case spanned two months and began with a Florida Bar complaint on Apr. 12.
Click here to read the Florida Bar's complaint against Stephen Rakusin.
Reiterating the findings of the trial court, the complaint said that allegations made in the Watson case “were palpably and demonstrably false and untrue.”
Damico agreed that “litigation did not involve simple zealous advocacy or a good faith effort to assert Ms. Watson's rights. Rather, the lawsuit was comprised of baseless claims which were completely devoid of merit, either legally or factually, and which were prosecuted in bad faith.”
In response, the trial court awarded attorney fees of $42,250 against Rakusin and his firm, and another $42,250 against Watson.
Centennial Bank has since filed a suit against Rakusin's firm over unpaid rent.
Rakusin represented himself for the majority of proceedings and hired Kevin P. Tynan of Richardson & Tynan in Tamarac as co-counsel. Neither responded to requests for comment before deadline.
Rakusin claimed he acted in good faith, and that his actions in the case were ethical and proper. He also claimed the Florida Bar's evidence didn't meet the burden of clear and convincing, and asserted that the statute of limitations had expired.
Rakusin was admitted to the bar Oct. 25, 1974, and specializes in construction law.
Linda I. Gonzalez represented the Florida Bar and did not wish to comment on the case.
Read Judge Paul Damico's full report
||
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250