Florida Supreme Court Repeals JQC's Confidentiality Amendments
The Florida Supreme Court said no to the Judicial Qualifications Commission's bid to authorize its investigative and hearing panels to brand certain filings confidential.
September 19, 2018 at 11:12 AM
2 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court has repealed amendments to two Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission rules, which authorized its investigative and hearing panels to keep certain high court filings hush-hush.
According to the court, the amendments are “beyond the commission's authority under the Florida Constitution” and are “inconsistent” with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420, which governs public access to judicial branch records.
The judicial administration rule lists a variety of circumstances in which confidentiality is necessary.
These include protecting trade secrets or a governmental interest, avoiding “substantial injury” to innocent third parties, and preventing “a serious and imminent threat to the fair, impartial, and orderly administration of justice.”
The JQC, which has independently investigated alleged misconduct by Florida state judges since 1966, submitted the amendments for review on July 24, 2017.
The first alteration came in the form of an extra sentence tacked onto Rule 6(k), authorizing the JQC's investigative panel to designate certain filings confidential.
The second was a new rule, 20(b), which gave the hearing panel the ability to “designate portions of the record, findings, and recommendation confidential,” subject to further order of the Florida Supreme Court.
Read the Florida Supreme Court's ruling on the amendments:
According to the JQC's website, its investigative panel functions “much like a grand jury,” while its hearing panel “serves as a special master” in the way it compiles findings of fact and recommends sanctions to the Florida Supreme Court.
The JQC's amendments also suggested that confidential “materials” would include those already listed in Rule 2.420, as well as “other medical and psychological records, or filings referencing those materials.”
The panel of justices published its decision per curiam, ruling that only the Florida Legislature has the power to create new exemptions of that nature.
Related stories:
Disbarment Recommended for Lawyer Stephen Rakusin Over 'Baseless' Lawsuit
JQC Drops Case Against Former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stephen Millan
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250