Miami Beach Settles With Motorist Hit by Parking Officer
The city was confident about pursuing an appeal based on a "fatal error" made by Miami-Dade Judge Pedro P. Echarte Jr. on admission of evidence.
September 20, 2018 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
The city of Miami Beach has reached an $190,000 settlement with a motorcyclist and his wife following a reported collision with a parking officer driving a city vehicle.
Emomotimi S. Brisibe, Miami Beach's senior assistant city attorney, told the Daily Business Review that the settlement was reached following an $850,000 verdict against the city.
Plaintiff Juan Jaime Cacho Abanto claimed he was in a collision on Dec. 2, 2016, with parking enforcement officer Lilliam J. Mena, but the sides disputed whether the two vehicles actually made contact.
Read the complaint:
The city retained appellate counsel following what Brisibe referred to as “a fatal error” by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Pedro Echarte Jr. during trial.
“Ms. Mena was wearing a body camera video on her when the incident happened. She turned it on after she came out of her vehicle after this alleged accident, and there was a video recording that ensued when she put the body camera on,” Brisibe said.
According to the city's lawyer, Mena told the responding police officer that she “might have” struck Abanto after reversing her car to avoid pedestrians crossing at the intersection of Alton Road and 10th Street. The plaintiff alleged Mena hit his scooter, causing injury to his right knee and shoulder.
“We filed a motion in limine to exclude those statements on the video cam from being played or shown to the jury on the grounds of the accident report privilege,” Brisibe said. “The judge ruled … and denied our motion in limine.”
Accident report privilege shields a motorist from having statements made during an accident investigation used against them at trial.
“The reason for the privilege is to give people the opportunity to speak freely after an accident. … You want people to be free to speak with police officers when they get into accidents,” Brisibe said, adding accident report privilege is also designed to help the government with statistics and record keeping for public safety.
However, Brisibe noted Abanto admitted during a deposition that “there was no contact between the city vehicle and the scooter” despite his complaint alleging both he and his scooter were damaged.
Brisibe believed Mena's statement ”affected the jury when those statements were allowed in,” leading to the adverse verdict against the city.
Read the full verdict here:
“After the verdict came out we felt that the judge made a fatal error and was wrong,” Brisibe said. The city subsequently retained appellate counsel and had begun the process of filing a notice of appeal before changing direction.
Gary Friedman of Friedman & Friedman, Coral GablesSoon afterward Coral Gables attorney Gary Alan Friedman, counsel for Abanto and his wife, Edith Pilar Cabrera, reached out to Brisibe and the city to discuss the possibility of a settlement.
“The reason why the plaintiffs counsel got in touch with us to talk about a resolution was because they knew there was a strong possibility [the verdict] would be overturned on appeal,” Brisibe said. “Even the plaintiffs recognized the error in terms of [Judge Echarte] allowing those statements to come in.”
Friedman did not reply to requests for comment by deadline.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250