Broward Lawyer Negotiates $2.5M Settlement After Accident Photos, Statement Trip Up Defendant
Fort Lauderdale attorney Louis R. Battista of Bernheim Dolinsky Kelley pointed out inconsistencies in a defendant's deposition to yield a $2.5 million settlement for his client, Robert Lo Coco. Lo Coco endured a minor traumatic brain injury and other damages after colliding with a vehicle that stopped short.
September 24, 2018 at 10:23 AM
5 minute read
After a defendant was unable to reconcile their testimony with photographs taken from the scene of a motor vehicle collision that left plaintiff Tony Robert Lo Coco with a traumatic brain injury as well as damage to his spine, the parties eventually settled for $2.5 million.
On Aug. 20 2015, Lo Coco, a 29-year-old Comcast sales representative, was riding his motorcycle eastbound on Stickney Point Road in Sarasota, just as Edwin Allen Davies, a Virginia resident vacationing in Siesta Key, was pulling out of a nearby shopping mall in a sedan rented from Hertz. Although Lo Coco — who was not wearing a helmet at the time — jammed on his brakes to avoid striking Davies' vehicle, he nonetheless was flung from his motorcycle and wound up violently impacting the car.
According to Louis R. Battista, a civil trial attorney with the Fort Lauderdale firm of Bernheim Dolinsky Kelley, it was Davies' negligence as a driver that caused him and Lo Coco to collide in the first place.
Read the complaint:
“What really happened was [Davies'] at a stop sign, he's going to go pull across and he just … pulls out, darts out at the last second,” Battista recounted to the Daily Business Review. “He does mention that there's a car going westbound that kind of got him hung up, and that could have happened, so he maybe darts out and he's like, 'Oh damn … the car's coming.' But it doesn't explain why you just don't pull up in the median … and the accident doesn't happen. Poof!”
In addition to fractured ribs, a punctured lung and a spine fracture, the accident left Lo Coco with a minor traumatic brain injury. Battista told the Daily Business Review that his client's brain injury manifested itself as minor memory problems that gradually began to increase in frequency.
Battista added that he was aware that the defense would argue that it was Lo Coco's failure to wear a helmet — not Davies' stopping short — that led him to suffer the brain injury. However, Battista explains that because his client suffered from a deceleration injury, whether or not he was wearing a helmet at the time of the crash was irrelevant.
“When you have a TBI — whether it be a significant one with contusions and brain hemorrhages, or one like this where it doesn't come up on MRI or CT scan but the brain was obviously shaken — what happens is a deceleration injury. The body and brain [are] moving forward, and it impacts something which decelerates the force,” Battista explained. “That's how the brain [is] injured; that injury still occurs with a helmet on. If my helmet's on and you shoot me out of a cannon into a car, when I impact that car … the brain's still moving [in response to] the impact.”
Davies testified that when he left the shopping center he turned left into the median separating east and westbound lanes. However, Battista described this as a “not truthful” account of events, as photos taken from the scene of the accident as well as Davies' own statement to Hertz showed that he had not entered the median, but rather, stopped unexpectedly in Lo Coco's lane of travel, leaving him little time to slow down and enact an evasive maneuver.
“To give [Davies] credit, when he was facing this conflict he didn't know why he said that, but [noted while looking at the photographs] 'That definitely is a median and I definitely stopped in your client's lane of travel,' ” Battista said. “In his claims form, he specifically stated that he had crossed the eastbound lane. He wanted to turn left, and as he entered the second eastbound lane he noticed a vehicle was coming. And that was really about it. He says, 'I hesitated.' So in his own statement when everything was fresh in his mind on that day, he said, 'I went across the eastbound lanes. I wanted to go left. As I exited the second eastbound lane, I noticed a car coming … I hesitated. And then I saw the motorcycle and … the accident happened.' ”
The case resolved shortly after the inconsistencies of Davies' deposition were pointed out, with Battista noting that “ it was resolved before we even mediated.” The Fort Lauderdale attorney said that the strength of the case came from having a “very likable” client and a defendant who only admitted liability “when faced with photographs and his statement that he gave to Hertz.”
“It was a good result for everyone involved,” Battista said. “Lo Coco got what he deserves for his compensation for he was not wrong and he does have an uphill battle. He's a young guy, and he's going to need probably multiple surgeries just [on his] thoracic spine over the course of his life. … That's really going to limit his mobility, so he deserves that kind of recovery.”
Case: Tony Lo Coco v. Edwin Allen Davies
Case No.: 2017-CA-001723 NC
Description: Personal injury — motor vehicle crash
Filing date: April 6, 2017
Settlement date: June 1, 2018
Judge: Sarasota Circuit Judge Hunter W. Carroll
Plaintiffs attorneys: Louis R. Battista, Bernheim Dolinsky Kelley, Fort Lauderdale
Defense attorneys: Daniel Shapiro and Taylor Kaufman, Cole, Scott & Kissane, Tampa
Settlement amount: $2 million
Total settlement amount: $2,500,000 ($2 million, plus $500,000 from another insurance company before this settlement)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250