'It's Harsh': Disbarred Florida Lawyer Kelley Andrea Bosecker Speaks Out
"I never held myself out to be an attorney during the suspension period," said St. Petersburg attorney Kelley Andrea Bosecker, who has lost her license to practice law after she was found guilty after violating the terms of a previous disciplinary order.
September 28, 2018 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
|
The Florida Supreme Court has sided with court-appointed referee Hillsborough Circuit Judge Martha J. Cook, who recommended that St. Petersburg foreclosure defense attorney Kelley Andrea Bosecker lose her license to practice law after she was found guilty of violating the terms of a previous disciplinary order.
Cook found Bosecker guilty of violating four bar rules, which govern suspension, notice to clients, notice of employment required and conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, fraud or misrepresentation. The court ultimately sided with the Florida Bar, which claimed that Bosecker “failed to timely notify opposing counsel, the courts and her clients that she was suspended, and she was practicing law while suspended.”
Bosecker, who's been a lawyer for 29 years and has never had a client complaint, said she felt the decision was “harsh.”
“I admitted I made mistakes in administering the suspension, and I apologized and nobody was hurt,” Bosecker said. “Why would they come after me so hard on silly little issues?”
Read the Florida Supreme Court's decision:
|Bosecker was suspended for 45 days on May 5, 2016, and ordered to pay a total of $8,000 in restitution for pursuing “frivolous” claims on behalf of her client in a property dispute case. Bosecker said she disagreed with the court's description of her actions, claiming she was attempting to look out for her clients, as “banks violate the law constantly and nothing seems to happen to them.”
“Somebody needs to do something and I was trying, but I can't anymore,” Bosecker said.
The suspension stemmed from complaints made by three judges and two banks, and related to quiet title actions Bosecker had filed against lenders.
“I don't think the complaints were legitimate,” Bosecker said. “But I fully cooperated with the bar, which is supposed to make a huge difference.”
Related story: Disbarment Recommended for Lawyer Stephen Rakusin Over 'Baseless' Lawsuit
Bosecker filed a conditional guilty plea and reached a consent judgment with the Florida Bar, which sparked the 45-day suspension and a two-year probation period. According to the consent judgment, Bosecker's “meritless theory” was that “a cloud was created on her clients' title to their property because the defendant lenders failed to acknowledge loan documents.”
“I had a conceptual problem because I didn't think I'd done anything wrong,” Bosecker said. “But when [my attorney] told me I needed another $25,000 to go to trial, I told them I couldn't afford it.”
The executive director of the Florida Bar in Tallahassee, Joshua E. Doyle, Tampa attorneys Chardean Mavis Hill and Katrina S. Brown, and Sunrise attorney Adria E. Quintela served as counsel to the Florida Bar, which would not comment on the case.
Read the Florida Bar's petition for contempt against Bosecker
Before Bosecker's 2016 suspension took effect, she claimed she called her clients to let them know.
“A lot of them didn't want to retain new attorneys because it was a short period and it costs money for them to do that. It was a very difficult thing to administer given the fact that it was such a short time period,” Bosecker said. ”I made some mistakes. … I didn't timely send out all my suspension notices and I did do some emails and things asking for extensions to opposing counsel. The email said in the first sentence, 'I am currently suspended from the practice of law.' I never held myself out to be an attorney during the suspension period.”
Bosecker was also admonished after admitting to minor misconduct in May 2014, when the Florida Bar claimed that she had “failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client in a landlord/breach of contract matter.”
Bosecker was admitted to the bar in 1984.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250