Miami Lawyers Land $4.8M For Winn-Dixie Customer Who Went 'Through Hell and Back'
Miami lawyers Meranda Reifschneider and Raul E. Garcia of Rubenstein Law argued that if staff at a Winn-Dixie store in Miami Lakes had fixed or unplugged a leaking produce case, Juan Del Valle would never have slipped and needed three spinal surgeries.
October 01, 2018 at 01:46 PM
6 minute read
|
Meranda Reifschneider and Raul E. Garcia of Rubenstein Law in Miami secured a $4.8 million jury verdict for Juan Del Valle and his wife Oslayda Vento against Winn-Dixie Stores Inc. after a nasty fall left him with lifelong injuries.
“He fell hard,” Reifschneider said of Del Valle, who will have metal plates and screws in his body “for the rest of his life.”
In July 2014, Del Valle was shopping for an onion at Winn-Dixie of Miami Lakes when he rounded a corner and slipped on a puddle of water. Reifschneider told DBR that Del Valle landed on his backside and struck his head on the back of a produce case, which had been leaking water for weeks.
“They knew it was leaking,” Reifschneider said. “Their fix was to put absorbent strips around the edge of the cooler to absorb the water as it leaked out, but apparently those strips have to be checked and changed every so often to make sure they don't become oversaturated with water.”
Video footage revealed that in the hour before Del Valle's fall, no one approached the cooler to check the strips.
“They were pretty much completely ignored,” Reifschneider said.
Read the verdict form:
|Staff had put out a wet floor sign to warn people of the leak — but just the one.
“My client could not see [the sign] from the direction he was approaching,” Reifschneider said. “It was on one side of the cooler, and he was approaching from the other.”
Evan Abel and Michael Brand of Cole, Scott & Kissane in Miami represented Winn-Dixie, which contested negligence and argued that its employees' actions were reasonable.
Neither immediately responded to requests for comment.
At trial, Abel and Brand pointed out that Del Valle had waited a week before seeking medical attention. They also hired medical experts who argued that 57-year-old Del Valle's injuries were a product of his age.
However, Reifschneider and Garcia countered by highlighting that Del Valle had never before complained of back or neck pain to a doctor.
Click here to read Winn Dixie's answer and affirmative defenses
|
Del Valle was “reluctant” to undergo surgery, Reifschneider said, and spent a year experimenting with physical therapy and pain management injections before eventually having three spine operations. The defense's claim that Del Valle should have noticed the water and “been extra careful” not to slip because he was wearing flip-flops didn't “go over very well with the jury.”
“He's been through hell and back,” Reifschneider added.
Del Valle had an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which fused three levels of his spine, then had another fusion procedure on his lower back.
Del Valle later had a spinal cord stimulator implanted in his back, which sends electrical pulses to block pain signals.
“That's a device that comes with a generator, which is essentially a battery, and there are leads or wires that run from that generator up the spinal cord,” Reifschneider said.
Click here to read the full complaint
The generator has to be changed every 10 years, which according to Reifschneider means Del Valle is facing ”at a minimum, two or three additional surgeries to have that generator changed.”
The device comes with a “little remote control that he has to carry around,” which Reifschneider had Del Valle show the jury.
“It looks like a mini iPhone, and it's literally a remote control that controls how strong the pulses sent by his spinal cord stimulator are, so he can adjust it depending on his pain level at the time,” Reifschneider said.
Reifschneider also had Del Valle “take off his shirt and show the jury his back, which is covered in scars.”
The way Reifschneider saw it, that humanization of the plaintiff stirred something in the jury, as it awarded ”every penny” of Del Valle's past medical expenses.
“Slip and fall cases are challenging, even with good facts,” said Garcia, who served as co-counsel to Reifschneider. ”In this case, the jury clearly understood what Winn-Dixie did wrong and the monumental impact that the negligence had and will continue to have on Mr. Del Valle's life.”
Click here to read Raul Garcia's closing statement
Del Valle is “not the kind of person who's going to let anything get him down,” Reifschneider noted. 'That was actually one of the things that the defendant tried to attack him with.”
The defense used Facebook posts to demonstrate that Del Valle had attended a concert and taken a trip to Universal Studios for his daughter's birthday.
“Of course, he didn't ride the rides, and they had to push him around in one of those wheelchairs, but he went anyway,” Reifschneider said.
The jury also heard how Del Valle's wife has experienced “a lot of anxiety and worry” about what's going to happen to him as he ages.
“I know that bothers her a lot,” Reifschneider said. “It's hard for her to see him weakened, really. He tries to put on a happy face and an 'everything's going to be OK' attitude for her benefit, but their lives are different now.”
The jury awarded Del Valle and Vento a total of $4,877,775.85.
Case: Juan Del Valle v. Winn-Dixie Stores Inc.
Case no.: 2016-031038-CA-01
Description: Personal injury/premises liability
Filing date: December 5, 2016
Verdict date: September 11, 2018
Judge: Circuit Court Judge Daryl Trawick
Plaintiffs attorneys: Meranda Reifschneider and Raul Garcia of Rubenstein Law, Miami
Defense attorneys: Evan Abel and Michael Brand of Cole, Scott & Kissane, Miami
Verdict amount: $4,877,775.85
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 2DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 3Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 4Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 5Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250