Florida Federal Judge Quashes Coconut Water Class Action
Three coconut water consumers claimed that Vita Coco's "Born in Brazil" slogan was misleading as the company sourced the majority of its coconuts from elsewhere, but a federal judge disagreed, stating that, "AMI has not forced the plaintiff to buy Vita Coco."
October 03, 2018 at 02:40 PM
5 minute read
Robert N. Scola, a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida, dismissed a lawsuit and class action certification against All Market Inc. (AMI), the parent company of coconut water manufacturer Vita Coco, which plantiffs claimed had misled the public with Brazil-themed packaging.
Things got hairy for the coconut water manufacturer in April 2016 when plaintiffs Joshua Wasser, Ila Gold and Alyssa Rechtman filed a lawsuit alleging that “Born in Brazil,” a slogan printed on certain containers, was ”deceptive” because many of the company's coconuts came from other countries, including the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka and Malaysia.
As a result, the “plaintiffs purchased and drank Vita Coco that was not sourced or manufactured in Brazil, and that was made with non-Brazilian coconuts,” the complaint said.
Click here to read the complaint
Vita Coco argued that ”Born in Brazil” referred to the birth of the company itself, not the origin of its ingredients.
“Brazil is where the brand and the idea for Vita Coco was born. It quite literally was born on the beaches of Brazil,” said Melissa Pallett-Vasquez, who defended Vita Coco with the help of Lori Lustrin, Raquel M. Fernandez, Jennifer Junger and Jerry Goldsmith of Bilzin Sumberg in Miami.
Scola ruled that the plaintiffs had not proved sufficient “injury” and therefore lacked standing.
“AMI has not forced the plaintiff to buy Vita Coco,” Scola wrote. “If and when the plaintiffs choose to purchase Vita Coco in the future, they will do so with knowledge that the “born in Brazil” slogan does not reflect the location the beverage was manufactured in or sourced from.”
Scola also noted that the plaintiffs didn't supply records or data of any other consumers of Vita Coco, or receipts of their own purchases that would have shown their experiences were “typical of the injuries suffered by other members” of the proposed class action.
Richard I. Segal of Segal Zuckerman in Miami represented the plaintiffs with Philippe Lieberman and Steve I. Silverman of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine in Miami, neither of whom responded to requests for comment before deadline.
Related story: ”Born in Brazil” Vita Coco Sued Over its Source
According to Pallett-Vasquez, the premise of the lawsuit was “troubling” for Vita Coco.
“The idea that somehow a product from Southeast Asia was 'less than' is absolutely and categorically not correct,” she explained. “They are incredibly proud of the partnership that they have with their farmers in Southeast Asia. It's something they tout very proudly on their website. The suggestion that somehow the company was trying to hide that is just categorically false.”
Vita Coco containers no longer include the slogan due to a rebranding effort that the company said began before the lawsuit.
“There was a move away from having a lot of wording on the packaging,” Pallett-Vasquez said. She also noted that the company had complied with a federal regulation that dictates that country of origin must be clearly marked on packaging.
The plaintiffs also alleged that Vita Coco had used the Brazil link to elevate its prices, and they “would not have paid as much for the product” if they'd known.
“Because of this deception, AMI is able to sell Vita Coco at prices substantially higher than those of other coconut water brands that are manufactured in other parts of the world,” the complaint said.
But Pallett-Vasquez disputed that. “We know that that not only wasn't true before but it's not true today, because even in the absence of that statement on the packaging the pricing continues to be the same.”
The most “surprising” aspects of the case, she added, were “the factual positions” taken by the named plaintiffs.
“In one of the depositions, a woman took everything that was on the package as absolute truth, including a catchy phrase that said, 'More potassium than a banana (don't tell the monkeys),' ” Pallett-Vasquez said. “ I inquired as to whether or not she thought that Vita Coco was asking her to talk to monkeys, or not to tell the monkeys, and she said, 'Yes, I do.' ”
Read Judge Robert N. Scola's order:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Law's Class Action Forum to Feature Judges, New Rules, and Insights on MDL Practice
3 minute readArguing Class Actions: Meet and Confer Abuses as Defendants' Litigation Strategy
7 minute readLawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 2How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 4Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 5'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250