'It Ain't Over Until It's Over': Cruise Ship Passenger Wins Another $1M Verdict in Trial Redo
Trial No. 2 for Joyce Higgs, a cruise ship passenger who fractured her arm and shoulder after tripping over a "negligently" abandoned cleaning bucket, resulted in an almost identical million-dollar jury verdict.
October 03, 2018 at 01:05 PM
4 minute read
A federal jury in Florida became the second to award damages of more than $1 million to cruise ship passenger Joyce Higgs, who fractured her arm and shoulder after tripping over a cleaning bucket that she claimed was negligently left out in a hallway.
The ship was operated by Costa Crociere, an Italian company owned by Miami-based Carnival Corp., which maintained it was not at fault over both trials.
The first trial wrapped up in 2016 when a Fort Lauderdale jury decided on a $1.1 million award, which was thrown out by the appellate court because the judge didn't admit evidence that Higgs had a history of prior falls.
“The end result comes out to be within $25,000 of what it was last time,” said Robert A. Chaffin of the Chaffin Law Firm in Texas, who served as co-counsel to Nicholas A. Homan on the case.
Read the jury verdict:
|This time around, despite the admission of new evidence, Higgs was awarded more in past damages and less in future damages.
The jury found Costa 90 percent at fault, causing Higgs' liability to drop from 15 to 10 percent.
Lead counsel Homan presented a string of documents in his opening statement, which he said demonstrated Costa's attempts to conceal evidence, including photographs of the scene of the accident and the identity of a key witness.
Costa countered by questioning the severity of Higgs' injuries, arguing that prior arthritis, back and knee issues played a role.
Richard James McAlpin of McAlpin Conroy in Miami, lead counsel to the defense, did not respond to request for comment.
Click here to read the defense's answer to the complaint
“It was a hard-fought trial,” Chaffin said.
Chaffin had worried that Higgs, who stands at 5-foot-1, weighs 306 pounds and “could not walk into the courtroom without the assistance of a walker,” would face implicit bias from the “rather conservative jury” comprising businesspeople.
“We were trying a trip and fall case with a person that essentially can't walk anymore,” Chaffin said. “It's hard to overcome something like that, when the jury sees and makes an impression of what the person is like.”
The foreman of the jury had served as an accident investigator and claims adjuster, “which is unusual,” Chaffin said.
But ultimately, key evidence that had been introduced by Costa in the first trial paid off for the plaintiff.
“They had a surveillance team make videos of [Higgs] when she took her compulsory medical exam about two and a half years ago,” Chaffin said. “At the time they made they video, she weighed about 40 pounds less and was able to walk much, much better.”
With that, Chaffin and Homan argued that her injuries had caused her health to deteriorate since 2016.
Chaffin said Higgs, a retired schoolteacher living on slightly more than $1,000 a month, is pleased with the result. But he's hesitant to call it a victory just yet.
“It ain't over until it's over,” Chaffin said. And, as he tells it, there's room for compromise.
“We'd be willing to give some sort of a modest discount,” he noted. “She's 72 years old now. She's not getting any younger, and her health is not that good. She could certainly use the money to help smooth the way along in life, because it's hard to live on $1,000 a month.”
Related story: Woman Awarded $1.1 Million in Cruise Dining Room Fall
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Chicago Federal Court Offers Banks Relief From Illinois' Historic Credit Fee Curbs
- 2Most New Eversheds Sutherland US Partners Are in Atlanta
- 3Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 4Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 5Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250