What Could the Rise of Cryptocurrencies Mean for South Fla. Businesses?
As a major hub for international business, South Florida is becoming ground zero for the cryptocurrency revolution. In fact, Miami hosted the 2018 North American Bitcoin Conference— the fifth and most attended installment of the conference—and is slated to host the 2019 show.
October 08, 2018 at 09:18 AM
5 minute read
As a major hub for international business, South Florida is becoming ground zero for the cryptocurrency revolution. In fact, Miami hosted the 2018 North American Bitcoin Conference— the fifth and most attended installment of the conference—and is slated to host the 2019 show.
The appealing aspect of cryptocurrencies is the ability to facilitate international transactions where a business relies heavily on international clientele and investors. Using cryptocurrency for major international transactions can bypass the typical intermediaries such as correspondent banks, yet, still provide “real-time” transaction settlements similar to the real-time gross settlement system (RTGS).
|Cryptocurrencies: Should I or Shouldn't I?
There could be several advantages to using a cryptocurrency. For example, transacting business only in bitcoin means you would no longer have to manage multiple currency accounts. All that you would need is a single bitcoin wallet. The payments are very fast, and competitive with the speed of the RTGS system, and they are secure and confidential. In addition, crypto transactions have a reduced credit risk, since the funds must be available in the bitcoin wallet at the time of payment.
Cryptocurrencies can also streamline and simplify foreign exchange management, and can be ideal if you are doing business with countries experiencing currency volatility, since holding currency in a universal settlement currency may protect you from sudden severe drops in the value of local currency.
Perhaps the best way to decide if you want to use them, is by examining how cryptocurrency might impact your business' bottom line. Following is a closer look at some key areas where digital currencies offer potential benefits and risks.
- Reduced Transaction Fees
Generally speaking, cryptocurrencies have no direct processing fees. Unlike with credit card transactions, cryptocurrencies are decentralized, which means that transactions have no third-party involvement. Coins and tokens are not developed or controlled by a single authority like fiat money that is issued by a sovereign government, but instead work directly through blockchain technology. If you are a merchant selling online, you will, however, likely be charged a small flat fee for your merchant wallet account or accounts like BitPay or CoinPayments, which allow you to accept certain cryptocurrencies.
- Faster Payment
Cryptocurrency transactions happen almost immediately, unlike credit card payments that may take days to clear. Sales are also final, which means that charges cannot be negated after the fact. All of this translates into more financial security for your business.
- Improved Customer Access
Ultimately, by simply accepting cryptocurrency payments, you may boost your bottom line as you attract new customers. Acceptance of crypto can help your expand globally as described above, and can also help you to attract new clients domestically.
- Volatility in Value
Cryptocurrencies are notoriously volatile, which makes them attractive to investors, but also potentially dangerous for businesses that accept them as payment. However, for many merchants, the volatility issue is muted by the fact that merchant wallet accounts offer immediate conversion to fiat money. Unless a crash occurs within seconds after a payment is made and accepted, most companies are protected from volatility. For this reason, most do in fact choose to automatically convert payments to fiat. If you choose not convert, you are essentially taking the risk that comes with coin investment.
- Lack of Regulation
Cryptocurrency is still relatively new, and as a result, governments around the world have issued limited and differing regulations. Some nations, have aggressively moved to embrace and promote cryptocurrency. But overall, a general lack of regulations, including here in the United States, can mean uncertainty for businesses that deal in cryptocurrency, including uncertainty about what kinds of taxes and investment limitations may be imposed in the future.
Reuters recently reported that the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is “aggressively” pursuing virtual currency platforms that lack strong internal safeguards against money laundering.
- Taxation and Accounting Challenges
In 2014, the IRS released IRS Notice 2014-21, which declared that for U.S. income tax purposes, a cryptocurrency is property and not a currency. Depending on the facts, that means the character of the cryptocurrency could be business property, investment property, or other property. Therefore, the general U.S. tax principles that apply to any property transaction should be applied to exchanges of cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies held for investment and sold for a gain are subject to short-term or long-term capital gains tax. Conversely, those investment-held cryptocurrencies sold for a loss are able to utilize a capital loss.
The IRS notice does not, however, resolve all issues related to reporting requirements or taxation. Some of the unresolved issues include foreign account reporting, and taxation of crypto-forks.
Of course, you should not make any decision regarding the use of cryptocurrencies, based solely on the information in an article like this one. To understand all of the implications of using, accepting or investing in cryptocurrency, you would be well-advised to start by talking to your financial and tax advisers today.
Erick Wendelken is a principal in the tax and accounting department at MBAF in Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250