What Could the Rise of Cryptocurrencies Mean for South Fla. Businesses?
As a major hub for international business, South Florida is becoming ground zero for the cryptocurrency revolution. In fact, Miami hosted the 2018 North American Bitcoin Conference— the fifth and most attended installment of the conference—and is slated to host the 2019 show.
October 08, 2018 at 09:18 AM
5 minute read
As a major hub for international business, South Florida is becoming ground zero for the cryptocurrency revolution. In fact, Miami hosted the 2018 North American Bitcoin Conference— the fifth and most attended installment of the conference—and is slated to host the 2019 show.
The appealing aspect of cryptocurrencies is the ability to facilitate international transactions where a business relies heavily on international clientele and investors. Using cryptocurrency for major international transactions can bypass the typical intermediaries such as correspondent banks, yet, still provide “real-time” transaction settlements similar to the real-time gross settlement system (RTGS).
Cryptocurrencies: Should I or Shouldn't I?
There could be several advantages to using a cryptocurrency. For example, transacting business only in bitcoin means you would no longer have to manage multiple currency accounts. All that you would need is a single bitcoin wallet. The payments are very fast, and competitive with the speed of the RTGS system, and they are secure and confidential. In addition, crypto transactions have a reduced credit risk, since the funds must be available in the bitcoin wallet at the time of payment.
Cryptocurrencies can also streamline and simplify foreign exchange management, and can be ideal if you are doing business with countries experiencing currency volatility, since holding currency in a universal settlement currency may protect you from sudden severe drops in the value of local currency.
Perhaps the best way to decide if you want to use them, is by examining how cryptocurrency might impact your business' bottom line. Following is a closer look at some key areas where digital currencies offer potential benefits and risks.
- Reduced Transaction Fees
Generally speaking, cryptocurrencies have no direct processing fees. Unlike with credit card transactions, cryptocurrencies are decentralized, which means that transactions have no third-party involvement. Coins and tokens are not developed or controlled by a single authority like fiat money that is issued by a sovereign government, but instead work directly through blockchain technology. If you are a merchant selling online, you will, however, likely be charged a small flat fee for your merchant wallet account or accounts like BitPay or CoinPayments, which allow you to accept certain cryptocurrencies.
- Faster Payment
Cryptocurrency transactions happen almost immediately, unlike credit card payments that may take days to clear. Sales are also final, which means that charges cannot be negated after the fact. All of this translates into more financial security for your business.
- Improved Customer Access
Ultimately, by simply accepting cryptocurrency payments, you may boost your bottom line as you attract new customers. Acceptance of crypto can help your expand globally as described above, and can also help you to attract new clients domestically.
- Volatility in Value
Cryptocurrencies are notoriously volatile, which makes them attractive to investors, but also potentially dangerous for businesses that accept them as payment. However, for many merchants, the volatility issue is muted by the fact that merchant wallet accounts offer immediate conversion to fiat money. Unless a crash occurs within seconds after a payment is made and accepted, most companies are protected from volatility. For this reason, most do in fact choose to automatically convert payments to fiat. If you choose not convert, you are essentially taking the risk that comes with coin investment.
- Lack of Regulation
Cryptocurrency is still relatively new, and as a result, governments around the world have issued limited and differing regulations. Some nations, have aggressively moved to embrace and promote cryptocurrency. But overall, a general lack of regulations, including here in the United States, can mean uncertainty for businesses that deal in cryptocurrency, including uncertainty about what kinds of taxes and investment limitations may be imposed in the future.
Reuters recently reported that the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is “aggressively” pursuing virtual currency platforms that lack strong internal safeguards against money laundering.
- Taxation and Accounting Challenges
In 2014, the IRS released IRS Notice 2014-21, which declared that for U.S. income tax purposes, a cryptocurrency is property and not a currency. Depending on the facts, that means the character of the cryptocurrency could be business property, investment property, or other property. Therefore, the general U.S. tax principles that apply to any property transaction should be applied to exchanges of cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies held for investment and sold for a gain are subject to short-term or long-term capital gains tax. Conversely, those investment-held cryptocurrencies sold for a loss are able to utilize a capital loss.
The IRS notice does not, however, resolve all issues related to reporting requirements or taxation. Some of the unresolved issues include foreign account reporting, and taxation of crypto-forks.
Of course, you should not make any decision regarding the use of cryptocurrencies, based solely on the information in an article like this one. To understand all of the implications of using, accepting or investing in cryptocurrency, you would be well-advised to start by talking to your financial and tax advisers today.
Erick Wendelken is a principal in the tax and accounting department at MBAF in Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250