Coral Gables Attorney Helps Win Victory for Airline in International Dispute Over Faulty Landing Gear
John M. Murray and Rollin M. Smith of Murray, Morin & Hernan helped guide Bahamasair to victory in a long battle. The case concerned the April 20, 2007, crash landing of a Bahamasair aircraft after its left landing gear failed.
October 09, 2018 at 04:02 PM
4 minute read
One of Britain's highest appellate courts handed a victory to Coral Gables aviation attorney Rollin M. Smith and other Florida lawyers on Monday, capping off a dispute that's spanned more than a decade.
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the highest court of appeal for select members of the British Commonwealth as well as former English territories, issued a ruling in favor of Nassau-based Bahamasair on Oct. 8. The case in question concerned Bahamasair's lawsuit against manufacturer Messier-Dowty over the collapse of a landing gear on a Bahamasair DHC-8-301, or “Dash 8″ aircraft, on April 20, 2007. No passengers died, but the airplane was completely demolished.
The Privy Council reinstated an October 2014 ruling in the Bahamian Supreme Court that had ordered Messier-Dowty to award $3,484,459 in damages to Bahamasair for the destruction of the Dash 8 in addition to legal costs. The chief justice found that Messier-Dowty had failed to properly alert the airline of deficiencies and subsequent risks that existed within older models of their landing gear. Although the manufacturer distributed newer models without these risks, the chief justice found that it did not properly stress the dangers of the outdated design to Bahamasair.
Read the British appellate court's ruling here:
Messier-Dowty successfully challenged the ruling in the Court of Appeal of the Bahamas, which issued an order reversing the trial court's judgment. The appellate court held that the chief justice did not consider the breadth of evidence in the case and reversed his decision entirely, including the award of costs.
John M. Murray, partner at the Tampa office of Murray, Morin & Hernan, was brought onto the case by Bahamasair's London-based underwriters shortly after the originating crash took place.
“We were involved rather quickly, early 2008 I believe,” Murray recounted to the Daily Business Review. “We did some significant investigation, expert witnesses, the stuff that you do to get ready for trial.”
Murray is a licensed pilot. He and fellow aviation attorney Smith, an associate at Murray, Morin & Hernan's Coral Gables office, conducted the investigation that prompted Bahamasair to file suit against Messier-Dowty.
“Aviation is constantly changing. Anytime a company can make a safety upgrade, they do so,” Murray said. “Messier-Dowty made a safety upgrade to this landing gear, but rather than come back to the users of the landing gear and say, 'You need to upgrade it,' they just let it sit. So [Bahamasair] assumed they could use the old part for the duration of its service life.”
Murray asserted that Messier-Dowty should have informed the airline to fix or replace the part as soon as possible, because the part adorning their Dash 8 planes would not last.
Although Bahamian commercial attorney Krystal Rolle argued on behalf of the airline in both the trial and appellate courts, Murray and Smith traveled abroad to be present during the proceedings. Murray described the Privy Council's procedure as well as Rolle's arguments, which lasted far longer than the 20 minutes attorneys are allotted before the U.S. Supreme Court, as alternately “awe-inspiring” and “amazing.”
According to Murray, the Privy Council's ruling should not leave room for further legal proceedings, effectively ending the decadelong legal saga.
“There's no punitive anything against [Messier-Dowty] but we are in the British system, and they have a loser-pays system [and] winners generally recover fees and costs,” Murray said. “There was nothing improper that would lead to any punitive actions at all. We disagreed, obviously, on the outcome of the case.”
Messier-Dowty's lawyer Frederick P. Alimonti, founder and senior partner of New York-based aviation law firm Alimonti Law Offices, was unable to consult with his client by press time to offer comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe 2024 Global 200: The Year Law Firms Had to Get Smart (And Ruthless)
Global Antitrust Authorities Will Aggressively Target Labor, AI and Consumer Goods in 2024, Report Says
5 minute readMiami's Rise as 'Global Metropolis' Challenges New York as International Arbitration Hub
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250