What's Left to Argue? Florida, Texas Lawyers Fight Over Ad Slogan
This case begs for an answer. The shorthand question is "Ever Argued With a Woman?" A female attorney in Florida claims a trademark violation by a Texas law firm with the same slogan — plus one letter.
October 11, 2018 at 05:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Florida lawyer Melissa Wilson, who has used the slogan “Ever Argued With a Woman?” since 2007, is doing more than argue with San Antonio lawyer Heather Clement Tessmer about their website taglines.
Wilson filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Tessmer and her firm over their use of the very similar slogan “Ever Argue With a Woman?”
Tessman's phrase “is causing and will continue to cause confusion, mistake or deception on the public as to an affiliation, sponsorship or approval between plaintiff and defendants' legal services,” according to Wilson's complaint filed Tuesday in San Antonio federal court.
Wilson, owner of Advocate Law Firm in Bartow east of Tampa, is seeking a court order to prevent Tessmer and Tessmer Law Firm from “engaging in the acts of trademark infringement and unfair competition” and from using “Ever Argue With a Woman?”, “Ever Argued With a Woman?” and any other “confusingly similar” verbiage.
Wilson, who practices family law, also seeks all of the profits the defendants made from the “trademark infringement and unfair competition” and unspecified damages.
Tessmer, who does family law, estate planning and personal injury litigation, was not available for comment by deadline.
However, responding to the allegations on Tessmer's behalf, associate Christine Rudy said: “We are not worried about it. We've been using this since at least January of 2012.”
Wilson and her lawyer, John Cave of Gunn, Lee & Cave in San Antonio, had no comment by deadline.
In the complaint, Wilson maintains she has used the trademark “Ever Argued With a Woman?” for advertising legal services since September 2007 and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued her a trademark on July 22, 2014. She said the trademarked slogan has provided her a significant amount of goodwill.
She said she licensed the mark to lawyers in New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia for legal services and is negotiating with a potential licensee in Texas.
The complaint said Tessmer and her firm have used “Ever Argue With a Woman?” since at least early 2014 for legal services in the San Antonio area and on billboards, a website, business cards and promotional material.
The Bartow lawyer said she learned about the Texas “infringing mark” in April 2014 when “confused members of the public” contacted her to ask if she opened an office in San Antonio or was affiliated with the defendants.
Wilson said she notified Tessmer by email in July 2014 of her trademark rights and objected to the similar mark but has been unable to speak with Tessmer. The complaint said Tessmer Law Firm was issued a trademark in Texas in May for “Ever Argue With a Woman?” for representing clients in civil litigation and other matters.
Wilson insists Tessmer Law Firm's Texas trademark registration is invalid because of her prior use and ownership of the “Ever Argued with a Woman?” trademark.
Related Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readNorth Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250