4th DCA Rules for Nurse Accused of Pilfering Prescription Drugs From Patients
The appellate court's order found that the Florida Department of Health's Board of Nursing erred in revoking Marie C. Cadet's nursing license.
October 17, 2018 at 05:08 PM
3 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal on Wednesday ruled in favor of a nurse appealing the revocation of her license.
The appellate court found the Florida Department of Health's Board of Nursing violated Marie C. Cadet's due process rights by “imposing a higher than permissible penalty” on the caregiver. The Department of Health alleged that Cadet had misappropriated expired prescription drugs from patients under her care in a nursing home, and had “engaged in unprofessional conduct” and ”failed to meet the minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practices” under Florida Statutes.
The opinion, authored by Judge Dorian K. Damoorgian, held that although the allegations against Cadet may have fit the charges of “unprofessional conduct,” they did not meet the definition of “failing to meet the minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practices.”
Read the opinion:
The statutory definition cited in the ruling characterizes “practical nursing” as “based upon the individual's educational preparation and experience in nursing,” and focuses primarily on a nurse's conduct when tending to patients under their watch.
Additionally, the opinion observed that of the two charges levied against Cadet, only one —failing to meet minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practice — qualified as grounds to suspend a nursing license.
“Nothing about the conduct the DOH alleged … had anything to do with the conduct outlined in the foregoing definition,” Damoorgian wrote. “The DOH did not allege or prove that appellant improperly administered or failed to administer drugs, exceeded the scope of her training, or did anything implicating patient care. Rather, the DOH's allegation of 'failing to return' the drugs established that appellant misappropriated the drugs by failing to return expired medications to her employer's pharmacy.”
In its footnotes, the ruling mentioned the disciplinary precedent for the charges against Cadet, noting that “the board's own rule history reflects that the misappropriation of drugs does not qualify as grounds for discipline under the failure to meet minimal standards provision.”
The appellate court ultimately reversed the order revoking Cadet's nursing license, remanded the case to the board to adjust her penalty in light of the new ruling.
Christine E. Lamia, chief appellate counsel with the Prosecution Services Unit of the Florida Department of Health, referred the Daily Business Review's request for comment to Louise R. St. Laurent.
St. Laurent, interim general counsel for the Florida Department of Health, did not respond by press time.
Cadet's attorney Luis A. Bonilla, managing partner at West Palm Beach firm Bonilla Law Associates, did not reply to requests for comment by press time.
Read more:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250