4th DCA Rules for Nurse Accused of Pilfering Prescription Drugs From Patients
The appellate court's order found that the Florida Department of Health's Board of Nursing erred in revoking Marie C. Cadet's nursing license.
October 17, 2018 at 05:08 PM
3 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal on Wednesday ruled in favor of a nurse appealing the revocation of her license.
The appellate court found the Florida Department of Health's Board of Nursing violated Marie C. Cadet's due process rights by “imposing a higher than permissible penalty” on the caregiver. The Department of Health alleged that Cadet had misappropriated expired prescription drugs from patients under her care in a nursing home, and had “engaged in unprofessional conduct” and ”failed to meet the minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practices” under Florida Statutes.
The opinion, authored by Judge Dorian K. Damoorgian, held that although the allegations against Cadet may have fit the charges of “unprofessional conduct,” they did not meet the definition of “failing to meet the minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practices.”
Read the opinion:
The statutory definition cited in the ruling characterizes “practical nursing” as “based upon the individual's educational preparation and experience in nursing,” and focuses primarily on a nurse's conduct when tending to patients under their watch.
Additionally, the opinion observed that of the two charges levied against Cadet, only one —failing to meet minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practice — qualified as grounds to suspend a nursing license.
“Nothing about the conduct the DOH alleged … had anything to do with the conduct outlined in the foregoing definition,” Damoorgian wrote. “The DOH did not allege or prove that appellant improperly administered or failed to administer drugs, exceeded the scope of her training, or did anything implicating patient care. Rather, the DOH's allegation of 'failing to return' the drugs established that appellant misappropriated the drugs by failing to return expired medications to her employer's pharmacy.”
In its footnotes, the ruling mentioned the disciplinary precedent for the charges against Cadet, noting that “the board's own rule history reflects that the misappropriation of drugs does not qualify as grounds for discipline under the failure to meet minimal standards provision.”
The appellate court ultimately reversed the order revoking Cadet's nursing license, remanded the case to the board to adjust her penalty in light of the new ruling.
Christine E. Lamia, chief appellate counsel with the Prosecution Services Unit of the Florida Department of Health, referred the Daily Business Review's request for comment to Louise R. St. Laurent.
St. Laurent, interim general counsel for the Florida Department of Health, did not respond by press time.
Cadet's attorney Luis A. Bonilla, managing partner at West Palm Beach firm Bonilla Law Associates, did not reply to requests for comment by press time.
Read more:
West Boca Nurse Cleared After Patient Develops Foot Drop
Florida Women Who Sued Doctor Now Focusing on Implant Maker
Hollywood Hills Nursing Home Death Records Ruling Put on Hold
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readAttorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250