More Oversight Planned After Improper University Spending
The revelation about the UCF spending prompted the Board of Governors to call for all 12 universities to review their funding of building projects over the last decade, while UCF is conducting its own investigation of the improperly used funds.
October 17, 2018 at 11:01 AM
3 minute read
After the University of Central Florida improperly paid for building projects, the university system's Board of Governors is moving forward with a plan that will require more oversight of so-called carry-forward funds that universities, unlike most state agencies, are allowed to accumulate.
Syd Kitson, chairman of the board's Budget and Finance Committee, said Tuesday the university system had accumulated more than $800 million in carry-forward funds as of August.
The funds have come under extra scrutiny after a state audit determined in August that UCF had improperly used $38 million in state funding to construct a campus building. The school's use of the accumulated operating funds was a direct violation of state policy that restricts that funding to such activities as instruction, research, student services and maintenance. UCF last month said other projects also appeared to be improperly funded.
The revelation about the UCF spending prompted the Board of Governors to call for all 12 universities to review their funding of building projects over the last decade, while UCF is conducting its own investigation of the improperly used funds.
Incoming House Speaker Jose Oliva, R-Miami Lakes, is also leading a legislative panel that will review the issue.
Without directly referring to the UCF issue, Kitson said the university system's accumulation of carry-forward funds is likely to become an issue as the schools advance their budget requests to the Legislature for the 2019-2020 academic year.
“The idea is for us to work together on this. There is an issue here. There were some events that occurred last year that have raised a lot of questions. And we're all trying to answer those,” said Kitson, whose committee met Tuesday in Tampa. “We need to take responsibility for it. And we need to step forward and work together to make it happen.”
Kitson outlined a plan, which he called “proactive,” that would require universities to develop spending plans for a portion of the carry-forward funds.
Of the more than $800 million, Kitson said $246 million is being held by the schools under a state requirement that each institution have a 5 percent reserve. Another $290 million is obligated under contracts and other arrangements, he said.
But he said the new oversight plan would focus on the remaining $289 million in carry-forward funds being held by the schools.
Kitson said the board will ask each school to develop a plan to spend those unobligated funds on uses such as the deferred maintenance of buildings, safety measures or financial aid.
The spending proposals would then be forwarded to the Board of Governors, which would review the plans in January, before the March start of the 2019 legislative session.
“The idea would be that these funds would stay at the university frozen in that carry-forward account, and once we go through an approval process here it would then be released to the university,” Kitson said.
He said the Legislature “would recognize that we're being thoughtful about these funds. We won't have to ask for as much. We are addressing the issue.”
Lloyd Dunkelberger reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Chief Business Development and Marketing Officer From EY
2 minute readMcDermott Welcomes Back Litigation Partner Following Stint With Miami-Dade County
3 minute readFlorida Bar Rolls Out Free Trust Accounting Software for All Its Members
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 2Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 3Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 4People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 5How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250