AG Candidate Sean Shaw Criticizes Prison Contractor's Donation to Opponent Ashley Moody
Shaw, the Democratic nominee for Florida's top law-enforcement position, described Moody's decision to accept more than $25,000 in campaign contributions from a private prison contractor as "disqualifying."
October 18, 2018 at 03:04 PM
4 minute read
GEO Group, a private prison firm that's been the subject of scrutiny for its involvement in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers, has chipped in a hefty contribution to the race for Florida attorney general.
And political players are taking notice.
Democratic nominee Sean Shaw held a press conference Wednesday to rail against his opponent, former state prosecutor and Republican nominee Ashley Moody, for accepting more than $25,000 in donations from the Boca Raton-based company.
“Ashley Moody's decision to allow a private prison company to bankroll her campaign isn't just wrong, it's disqualifying,” Shaw said. “A prison firm funding the state's top law-enforcement officer's campaign should raise all kinds of questions about what direction she wants to take the state in.”
Moody's campaign did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Related story: 'Give Me Four Years': Ashley Moody Outlines Bid For Attorney General
According to a July 10 WUSF report, GEO made a $3,000 contribution to Moody's personal campaign account in October 2017, before the substantial Oct. 3 donation to the Friends of Ashley Moody political action committee. Another news outlet, the Miami New Times, reported on Oct. 15 that GEO, one of the two largest prison contractors in the country, has repeatedly been beset by controversy. Besides long-standing concerns about GEO employees' treatment of inmates, the company has been criticized in recent months for operating detention centers used by ICE. Reports of torture, human-rights abuses and unpaid labor at GEO facilities have cropped up around the country.
According to Florida International University political science professor Kathryn A. DePalo, these sorts of campaign donations are “the reason why we have such strict disclosure” about financial contributions.
“When there are political donations made to legislators, there's a whole host of issues they could be voting on,” DePalo told the Daily Business Review. “I think with this particular donation, it is a little more suspect because the attorney general is a little more limited in areas of focus.”
Donors to judicial candidates are most commonly lawyers and other organizations who'll theoretically have business before the prospective official, DePalo noted.
“I'm not surprised at this donation, but it is one of those things where when you're talking about the judicial system… you would imagine there would be more objectivity there,” she added.
On Thursday a GEO Group representative characterized Shaw's statements as “the height of hypocrisy” in a statement to the DBR.
“We manage a family residential center in Karnes City, Texas, which allows the federal government to care for parents together with their children and which was established in 2014 by the Obama-Biden Administration. It's incredibly hypocritical for Sean Shaw to attack GEO over this Obama-Biden policy on the same day he accepted former Vice President Biden's endorsement,” the statement said. “We call on Sean Shaw to stop spreading misinformation, and we would encourage him to visit one of our Florida facilities to learn about how GEO is a leader in working to reduce recidivism and talk to participants in our rehabilitation programs who will personally speak to their preference of being in a GEO facility.”
Related story: Sean Shaw Campaigns for a Change in the Florida Attorney General's Office
Shaw described GEO's assertion as “laughable” when reached for comment by the DBR.
“They're suggesting there's some equivalency between me accepting Biden's endorsement and GEO money,” he said. “I don't know what's hypocritical about me talking about those news reports.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250