Big Law Partner Wants Miami Firms to Focus on Global Legal Markets
A Big Law partner believes Miami law firms can do more to improve their share of global business.
October 22, 2018 at 03:17 PM
5 minute read
Diversity is on the tips of everyone's tongues. It's become an issue at the forefront of the United States' cultural and political conversations, the media and legal profession.
But in Miami, a city brimming with people from different backgrounds and walks of life, some attorneys say the lack of diversity among law firms is holding the region back.
Among those raising their voices is commercial trial lawyer and former ACLU Miami chapter chairwoman Lida Rodriguez-Taseff, who calls for a less “insular” legal sector. Never one to bite her tongue, Rodriguez-Taseff has tackled problems at the voting booth and discrimination on the federal bench.
Justice Watch: Legal Community Puts Pressure On Rubio To Stop Blocking Judge
“I think it would be foolish to believe that the legal industry isn't going through the same growing pains,” she said. “I've seen firms deal with it well and become more diverse and inclusive, and I've seen others do not as well. I've been fortunate enough to be at firms that are grappling as well as they can with diversity and inclusion.”
But now, Rodriguez-Taseff would like to see Miami's entire legal sector broaden its reach by bolstering its ranks.
“With the exception of a few shining examples like DLA Piper, Miami really needs to improve on thinking bigger, more globally, more internationally,” she said.
After spending 19 years with Duane Morris, Rodriguez-Taseff left the firm to join DLA Piper in July. She says the move was inspired in part by an increasingly global client base.
“DLA's platform made absolute sense for me. It is a global, outward-facing law firm that is interconnected across the world,” Rodriguez-Taseff told the Daily Business Review. “[DLA] is a global powerhouse in a market like Miami, where what is needed are folks that are outward looking.”
A key step: diversifying big law firms.
“The bigger the thinking, the more international and more global the opportunities will be,” she said. “In order for the Miami legal market to lead, its weightiness needs to seen by the world. Miami becomes more weighty when its legal market becomes more diverse, more global, and more focused on the things that are important to corporations and individuals that conduct business around the world.”
She added: “Cultural awareness, linguistic diversity and cultural sensitivity is key to successfully navigating international business, and once the Miami legal market really learns to appreciate the value of that, it will be able to attract better work.”
However, other attorneys look at the state of Miami law as it pertains to diversity and professionalism and see a market that outpaces other metropolitan areas in the United States.
“If I had to measure our experience with litigation in Texas, New York and California, I will tell you that the Southern District of Florida to [my firm] has always been much more impressive in the sense of its care for ethical rules and professionalism between counsel,” said attorney Jorge Espinosa.
Espinosa, managing partner with Miami law firm Espinosa Martinez, conducts trademark litigation both domestically and internationally. In conversation with the Daily Business Review he asserted three prongs for assessing diversity efforts in legal communities.
“When we talk about diversity we really should look at it in three ways,” Espinosa explained. “One, are established firms bringing women and minorities into the firm? Are women and minorities employed by firms? Two, are they able to start their own firms and prosper? And three, are they integrated into the judiciary side of it?”
According to Espinosa, the Southern District of Florida has become much more diverse since he began practicing law in the early 1990s.
“We certainly have a large number of Hispanic-owned firms. I think we could do better with regards to woman-owned firms and certainly non-Hispanic minority-owned firms,” he said. “A lot of the larger firms in South Florida have done quite well to integrate minorities and women into their ranks … So maybe I don't see it, but I don't think South Florida fares badly relative to other parts of the country in that regard.”
Espinosa stated that one of the things holding Miami back from being an international legal player in accordance with its status as an international city is a lack of companies headquartered in the Magic City.
“We don't have R&D on the scale that they have in New York City, Los Angeles, Orlando … so you don't see the giant companies that generate work,” he said, contrasting Miami against the likes of San Francisco's industrious corporate landscape.
Ultimately, both Rodriguez-Taseff and Espinosa believe there's always room for growth and improvement.
“There is an opportunity for South Florida to be a top-tier international legal market,” Rodriguez-Taseff said. “And the opportunity begins with globalizing our local legal market.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Firms Increased First-Year Associate Hiring in 2024
Is Big Law's Nonequity Tier a 'Parking Lot' or a 'Ladder'?
The Case for Debate: Investing in Future Attorneys Through Competition
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250