Fort Lauderdale Lawyers Win $6.5 Million Over Smoker's Radiation Death
Justin Parafinczuk and Austin Carr of Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen, Fort Lauderdale, argued that the radiation therapy that caused musician Glenn Simmons' death would not have been necessary if tobacco companies hadn't encouraged him to smoke in the first place. Simmons, who smoked for 20 years, developed oral cavity cancer — but that wasn't what killed him, according to court filings.
October 29, 2018 at 01:15 PM
6 minute read
Fort Lauderdale lawyers Justin Parafinczuk and Austin Carr of Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen used Stuart v. Hertz's causation theory, rarely seen in tobacco cases, to land a $6.5 million Miami-Dade jury verdict for the family of Glenn Simmons, a cancer patient killed by complications after radiation treatment.
Simmons' daughter Hanifah Harewood brought the lawsuit in 2007 against R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., owners of Kool Cigarettes, and its two previous owners — Brown & Williamson and the American Tobacco Co.
In Simmons' day, Kool's ad campaigns seemed to speak directly to him.
“They would depict an African-American guy playing a guitar, smoking a cigarette, which was exactly who our client was,” Parafinczuk said.
As a young black man in the 1970s, Simmons played a few shows a week with his band. For the next 20 years, he also smoked a pack of Kool Cigarettes a day, court documents show.
In 1995 Simmons was diagnosed with oral cavity cancer, but that wasn't what killed him.
“He was actually going to be cancer-free,” Parafinczuk said. “But he died from the radiation treatment as a result of having the cancer.”
Simmons died April, 1, 2003, at 48.
Parafinczuk and Carr argued that Simmons was specifically targeted by Kool, based on his lifestyle.
“We know that their tactic in getting people hooked on cigarettes was to saturate certain markets and glamorize cigarette smoking in certain markets,” Parafinczuk said.
R. J. Reynolds denied it was to blame for Simmons' death, and defense attorney W. Randall Bassett, of King & Spalding's Georgia office argued that if Simmons had sought treatment earlier, he wouldn't have needed radiation therapy in the first place.
Bassett did not respond to a request for comment before deadline.
Click here to read the full amended complaint
As with any Engle progeny trial, the plaintiff had to convince a jury that the smoker's nicotine addiction was the legal cause of a smoking-related ailment.
As Simmons didn't die from cancer, the case wasn't straightforward for Parafinczuk and Carr, who instead had to legally link the tobacco companies to Simmons' radiation death.
“It's difficult to present all that to a jury, as opposed to just walking up and saying, 'They got him hooked on cigarettes, nicotine, tobacco and that's what killed him,'” Parafinczuk said. “It's a much more complicated case, and to my understanding that's why very few of them have even been tried in the state.”
Parafinczuk and Carr used the Stuart v. Hertz causation theory, based on a 1977 case in which the Florida Supreme Court ruled that car rental company Hertz Corp. was responsible for the alleged malpractice of a doctor after the plaintiff had a car accident.
The key to a successful Stuart v. Hertz case, according to Parafinczuk, is to avoid deviating from a simple narrative.
“It takes a lot of careful preparation with your witnesses and sticking to your plan for the trial. They've got to mention specific things in their testimony that you want to highlight,” Parafinczuk said.
In Simmons' case, a Miami-Dade jury found the defendants liable for his death, despite having never administered the radiation.
“You do have a concern with a complicated case like this that (the jury) might not understand and be able to follow the law, but it's clear that they did,” Parafinczuk said.
Dr. Francisco Civantos was the plaintiff's “most important” witness, according to Parafinczuk. Civantos was their expert in odontology — the study of cancer in the mouth. He was also the surgeon who treated Simmons' cancer, the one who “eventually observed him die from the radiation,” Parafinczuk said.
Civantos testified that Simmons died through no fault of his own and acted reasonably when seeking medical help for his cancer — counteracting R. J. Reynolds' argument that he waited too long to seek treatment.
But the jury dismissed that notion, finding that Simmons exercised reasonable care in securing a doctor and following his advice, after relying ”to his detriment” on R.J. Reynolds' representation of the health effects of its cigarettes.
At closing, defense attorney Bassett revisited the testimony of oral pathologist Dr. Samir El-Mofty, who argued that Simmons' cancer was caused by an infection after having a tooth removed.
From Parafinczuk's perspective, that was a “veiled attempt at a defense” that “the jury saw through.”
Click here to read the defense's answer to the complaint
The jury ultimately found Simmons 75 percent at fault, but lay the rest of the blame with R.J. Reynolds. It rejected the plaintiff's push for punitive damages, but did award Harewood $2.5 million in past damages and $4 million in future damages.
Harewood attended the trial, which Parafinczuk said “gave her closure.”
Read the verdict form:
Case: Hanifah Harewood, personal representative of the Estate of Glenn Simmons v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al
Case no.: 2007-46331-CA-02
Description: Wrongful death, product liability
Filing date: Dec. 28, 2007
Verdict date: Sep. 18, 2018
Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Rodolfo Ruiz
Plaintiffs attorneys: Justin Parafinczuk and Austin Carr, Koch Parafinczuk Wolf Susen, Fort Lauderdale
Defense attorneys: Randy Bassett, King & Spalding, Atlanta
Verdict amount: $6.5 million
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250