Morgan & Morgan Hit With $5 Million Verdict in Legal Malpractice Suit
Donald St. Denis (pictured) represented plaintiffs in a suit alleging Tampa-based Morgan & Morgan attorney Armando Lauritano botched the handling of a medical malpractice case. On Oct. 17 a Sarasota jury ruled that Lauritano and his firm are on the hook for damages the plaintiffs may have collected in the underlying case.
October 30, 2018 at 12:35 PM
5 minute read
A Florida jury has deemed an attorney with national law firm Morgan & Morgan liable for $5 million his clients lost in damages.
A Sarasota jury found that Armando Lauritano, a Morgan & Morgan attorney based in Tampa, cost former clients several million dollars' worth in damages by failing to properly file a medical malpractice claim against an obstetrics practice, nurse midwife and hospital.
Lauritano had originally been hired by Shawna Pollock and her husband, Rock, following the birth of their son in November 2006.
Pollock's uterus ruptured during childbirth after an emergency C-section was allegedly called far too late into the procedure, according to her attorneys. Her medical emergency deprived her son of oxygen, purportedly producing the brain damage with which the child, now 11, continues to contend.
Read the verdict form:
Morgan & Morgan has 450 lawyers in 50 cities across Florida, California, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Massachusetts, Kentucky, Mississippi, Indiana, Michigan, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.
John Morgan, the firm's founder, said the firm will fight the $5 million verdict.
“We have 450 lawyers in 50 cities. We collect over $1 billion a year for our clients,” Morgan said in a statement to the Daily Business Review. “This case was out of our Tampa Florida office. We defended this case because we think we are right. We still believe we are right. We have never ever had a verdict against our firm. We fully expect to win out right on appeal and have a judgement entered by the appellate courts in our favor. Stay tuned.”
'Never Preserved the Mother's Claim'
But opposing counsel painted a different picture.
According to Donald St. Denis, a Jacksonville-based attorney who represented the Pollocks in their legal malpractice suit, Morgan & Morgan attorney Lauritano dropped the ball from the very beginning and failed to visit his clients upon being hired.
St. Denis said that instead of visiting the family, Lauritano sent a private investigator to meet with the Pollocks at a Ronald McDonald House in Tampa, the couple's place of residence during their son's stay at All Children's Hospital.
“What lawyer doesn't have the time to go see a client like that?” St. Denis, a partner at St. Denis & Davey, told the Daily Business Review.
St. Denis argued that Lauritano was so intent on securing a large, potentially multimillion-dollar verdict in the underlying medical malpractice case that he neglected the parents' injuries.
“After it became apparent that Rock Jr. would qualify for no-fault benefits from the Florida Birth Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association [NICA], and well after the statute of limitations period for submitting pre-suit notice of the claims for Shawna's injuries, Morgan & Morgan withdrew from representing the Pollocks,” according to a press release from St. Denis & Davey.
“They never preserved the mother's claim because they were so focused on getting them out of NICA,” St. Denis said. “You have to tell the hospital and medical practice and say the woman is a claimant as well.”
St. Denis added that Lauritano's withdrawal left the Pollocks in a precarious legal position and subjected them to severe financial hardship. Additionally, the mother's injuries deprived Pollock and her husband of the ability to be intimate as well as have more children.
The Oct. 17 verdict held that had the medical malpractice case proceeded to trial, the gynecology office and midwife would have owed $4.5 million in damages to the Pollocks, while the Sarasota County Public Hospital District would have been responsible for $500,000.
Now Lauritano and his firm are culpable for all of it.
In addition to the $5 million verdict, St. Denis will also be seeking more than $1.2 million in attorney fees, as well as court costs in excess of $400,000 from Morgan & Morgan.
“We've already filed a motion to enforce the judgment against the insurance company,” St. Denis said. He added that with Morgan & Morgan attorneys bringing “over 17,000 cases per month … it makes it very difficult to handle things.”
Opposing counsel Dinah Stein of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein in Miami and Thomas Saieva of La Cava & Jacobson in Tampa did not respond to requests for comment by press time. Morgan & Morgan attorney Scott Whitley, who is listed as a legal representative for Lauritano and the firm, also did not respond.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Firms Increased First-Year Associate Hiring in 2024
Is Big Law's Nonequity Tier a 'Parking Lot' or a 'Ladder'?
The Case for Debate: Investing in Future Attorneys Through Competition
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250