Days Before Election, New Controversy in Race for Broward Judgeship
Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury has issued an injunction against political action committee A Better Florida For All, granting judicial candidate Corey Amanda Cawthon's request that the group be ordered to stop distributing election pamphlets since having its certification revoked in October.
November 02, 2018 at 06:27 PM
4 minute read
The race for a Broward judgeship took a litigious turn Wednesday when one candidate turned to the court to stop an advertising campaign endorsing her opponent.
Broward Circuit Judge William W. Haury on Friday granted an injunction against political action committee A Better Florida For All over its distribution of a left-leaning Broward Voters Guide, which endorsed Tanner Channing Demmery for the seat that plaintiff Corey Amanda Cawthon is eyeing.
The move came just days before the Nov. 6 general election, when Broward voters will select their new judge.
According to Cawthon's suit, the political action committee, its treasurers Jacqueline Ramsay and Omar Smith, and chairwoman Sophia Nelson illegally distributed their election guides after Oct. 25, when they lost certification to do so.
The judge has ordered the committee to stop distributing the guides or risk being found in contempt of court.
Distributing the material without certification violated election law, according to the court order, which labeled the group's actions “illegal electioneering” intended to “unlawfully interfere” with the upcoming election.
ABFFA did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday, and it's not clear whether it has a lawyer. The group's website appears to have been shut down.
The defendants failed to show up at their hearing, according to Cawthon's attorneys, Andrew M. Schwartz and Christopher S. Salivar, who are also her colleagues at Boca Raton law firm AMS Legal Team.
The ABFFA lost its license after falling behind on monthly reports detailing contributions and expenditures, then ignoring an administrative fine.
“At that point, the committee could not continue operating as a duly registered political committee,” Salivar said. “If the committee members had decided to follow the law and to cease distribution of these political advertisements in the name of a committee that was no longer registered, there never would have been an issue.”
ABFFA filed its last financial report in August, which according to exhibit D of Cawthon's complaint, listed contributions of more than $9,000 since March 2017 and an expenditure of $8,536.
“It was interesting that, all of a sudden, in the 60 days leading up to the Nov. 6 election, there's no reporting filed with the Division of Elections,” Salivar said.
Click here to read Cawthon's full complaint
Instead, Schwartz said, “You had people who were out at each of the early voting locations handing out these illegal guides.”
“If you're going to go ahead and have these political advertisements, you need to be upfront about the money you receive, where it comes from and how you spend it,” Schwartz said.
By Schwartz's estimate, the group put ”tens of thousands” of pamphlets in the hands of potential voters without permission.
Schwartz called the matter “extraordinarily serious” and “disturbing,” particularly on the eve of a general election.
“The problem is each one of the candidates is shoving pieces of paper in the face of all voters, so the people don't know what's legitimate and what isn't legitimate,” Schwartz said.
The guide appeared to be Democratic-leaning, though it's not clear whether any of the featured candidates gave the OK to be featured.
Though county court judges are elected to office, the judicial canon requires them to refrain from politics.
With the injunction now in place, Schwartz said police have been called to enforce it and “have these people stop disseminating the guide.”
Read the full court order:
|
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250