Receiver Sought for Royal Palm Beach Office Venture Where EB-5 Investors Claim Fraud
Thirteen Chinese investors want a court-appointed receiver for the office condo venture that purchased property but missed job-creation requirements.
November 02, 2018 at 10:11 AM
4 minute read
Chinese investors who say they were defrauded out of $7.3 million in EB-5 visa money injected into a Royal Palm Beach office venture now fear losing their U.S. residency as a result.
The 13 investors, who put in funds under the federal immigration program that grants green cards in exchange for a financial boost of at least $500,000 to a U.S. commercial venture, are asking for a court-appointed receiver to complete the project in line with EB-5 guidelines.
The investors say they were induced to put in the minimum amount plus a $60,000 administrative fee for the purchase and development of 60 commercial units at Royal Palm Business Plaza at 9200 Belvedere Road.
They said they were promised a tenant had been lined up and agreed to a 10-year lease, creating at least the minimum 10 jobs required under the EB-5 program for visas.
The investors on Sept. 20 sued Royal Palm Beach-based South Atlantic Regional Center LLC, a federally authorized center that connects EB-5 investors with opportunities in the U.S., and its founder, Joseph Walsh Sr., who is accused of orchestrating the scheme.
Not only did Walsh promise Connect Insurance Group Inc. would occupy the office and create jobs, he also said investors' loans would be secured by a mortgage on the property in their favor, according to the federal complaint.
The motion for a receiver filed Oct. 26 said Walsh didn't secure the mortgage for them and instead took out bank loans using the office property and rent as collateral. One of the defendants, Royal Palm Development I LLC, defaulted on a $8.8 million loan, according to the motion. Royal Palm Development I LLC is listed as the office units' owner in Palm Beach County property records and lists Walsh as its managing member in state corporate records.
The default prompted the bank to try to collect rent from tenants and threaten to seize the property, according to the motion.
This means the office condominiums bought with investors' money are in “immediate danger of significant loss, not only to Mr. Walsh and his fraudulent scheme,” but also to the bank, plaintiffs attorney Kenneth Murena argued in the emergency motion for a receiver. Murena is a partner at a Damian & Valori in Miami.
Walsh and South Atlantic Regional Center didn't return a call and email seeking comment by deadline.
The motion for a receiver seeks a preliminary injunction to prohibit Walsh, South Atlantic, Royal Palm Development and affiliates from taking any further action on behalf of the partnership, Royal Palm Town Center IV LLLP, which accepted investor funds in exchange for an interest in the limited partnership and the office property.
Investors claim Walsh misrepresented the project to the investors to give it an air of credibility. It's also alleged Connect Insurance temporarily rented space at Royal Palm Business Plaza but left before its lease expired and took some of the investors' money with it.
The motion said Murena has drawn a connection between Connect Insurance and Walsh, saying the corporation was acquired by a woman who is either Walsh's current or ex-wife.
Under the EB-5 visa investment program, investors go through two rounds of approval to obtain green cards. In this case, the investors passed the first round to get conditional green cards, but the government denied their round-two petitions for not meeting the job creation threshold, according to the complaint.
“Given the total lack of progress and misappropriation of investor funds at the project, the only way to complete it so that the investors may obtain permanent residency is for a receiver to take over, collect rent from existing tenants, complete the build-out and lease out the empty units,” Murena said by email. “Otherwise, the investors will likely lose not only their investments but also, their U.S. residency, and they may be required to leave the country.”
Two more investors, one from China and one from Vietnam, have retained Murena in the case and will be added to the complaint, increasing the total amount of money put up by litigating investors to $8.4 million.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 2Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 3'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 4FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 5California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250