Yes or No? What your Vote for 2 Broward County Charter Amendments Means
Here's a look at proposed revisions that could affect the legal sector.
November 02, 2018 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Broward County's Charter Review Commission has tacked a few amendments onto the ballot this year, but what do they mean?
Here's a look at two that will affect the legal sector.
The Broward County Charter was established in 1974 and approved by voters to serve as a written grant of authority or rights for the county. It's Broward's constitution, if you will.
The charter's language can't be changed without voter approval, so even the slightest edit requires a simple majority to go into effect.
This year, voters will decide when and how the Office of the Inspector General should conduct investigations. Broward's Inspector General, John W. Scott, acts as an independent watchdog, responsible for investigating allegations of fraud, corruption, ethics violations, gross mismanagement and other alleged misconduct by local government officials.
Scott is Broward's first and only inspector general, appointed by the independent Selection-Oversight Committee in April 2011, after voters in 2010 decided the post should be created. Now, it's asking voters to alter its investigative power.
Broward County Office of the Inspector General's Discretion to Commence An Investigation: “Shall the Broward County Charter be amended to give the Broward County Office of the Inspector General discretion, as opposed to a mandate, to commence an investigation if good cause exists that an entity or person over whom the inspector general has authority has engaged in misconduct or gross mismanagement?”
As it stands, the charter instructs the inspector general to conduct an investigation “if good cause exists.” Voting for this amendment would give the inspector general more room to investigate a person or a matter, allowing them to decide when a probe is or is not necessary.
According to the proposal packet submitted by Broward's OIG, this amendment came about because “there exists some unnecessary confusion over whether the OIG must commence an investigation if it receives a signed complaint stating facts that amount to good cause.”
The OIG is also seeking a board reshuffle.
Composition of the Broward County Inspector General Selection-Oversight Committee: “Shall the Broward County Charter be amended to revise the composition of the Broward County Inspector General Selection-Oversight Committee by replacing the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, or his/her designee, with an appointee of the Broward County Bar Association?”
The General Oversight Committee acts as an independent check on the OIG. While the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida sits on the committee, a “yes” vote would replace them with a member of the Broward County Bar Association (BCBA).
Why? Because the U.S. Attorney has historically shown little interest in taking part. When the first committee was selected, it was responsible for selecting members but declined to do so. With a BCBA representative at the helm, there'll likely be less red tape.
Related story:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
5 minute readBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250