Yes or No? What your Vote for 2 Broward County Charter Amendments Means
Here's a look at proposed revisions that could affect the legal sector.
November 02, 2018 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
Broward County's Charter Review Commission has tacked a few amendments onto the ballot this year, but what do they mean?
Here's a look at two that will affect the legal sector.
The Broward County Charter was established in 1974 and approved by voters to serve as a written grant of authority or rights for the county. It's Broward's constitution, if you will.
The charter's language can't be changed without voter approval, so even the slightest edit requires a simple majority to go into effect.
This year, voters will decide when and how the Office of the Inspector General should conduct investigations. Broward's Inspector General, John W. Scott, acts as an independent watchdog, responsible for investigating allegations of fraud, corruption, ethics violations, gross mismanagement and other alleged misconduct by local government officials.
Scott is Broward's first and only inspector general, appointed by the independent Selection-Oversight Committee in April 2011, after voters in 2010 decided the post should be created. Now, it's asking voters to alter its investigative power.
Broward County Office of the Inspector General's Discretion to Commence An Investigation: “Shall the Broward County Charter be amended to give the Broward County Office of the Inspector General discretion, as opposed to a mandate, to commence an investigation if good cause exists that an entity or person over whom the inspector general has authority has engaged in misconduct or gross mismanagement?”
As it stands, the charter instructs the inspector general to conduct an investigation “if good cause exists.” Voting for this amendment would give the inspector general more room to investigate a person or a matter, allowing them to decide when a probe is or is not necessary.
According to the proposal packet submitted by Broward's OIG, this amendment came about because “there exists some unnecessary confusion over whether the OIG must commence an investigation if it receives a signed complaint stating facts that amount to good cause.”
The OIG is also seeking a board reshuffle.
Composition of the Broward County Inspector General Selection-Oversight Committee: “Shall the Broward County Charter be amended to revise the composition of the Broward County Inspector General Selection-Oversight Committee by replacing the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, or his/her designee, with an appointee of the Broward County Bar Association?”
The General Oversight Committee acts as an independent check on the OIG. While the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida sits on the committee, a “yes” vote would replace them with a member of the Broward County Bar Association (BCBA).
Why? Because the U.S. Attorney has historically shown little interest in taking part. When the first committee was selected, it was responsible for selecting members but declined to do so. With a BCBA representative at the helm, there'll likely be less red tape.
Related story:
Election 2018: Here's a Roundup of Everyone Running for Judge in South Florida
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readExecutive Assistant, Alleging Pregnancy Discrimination and Retaliation, Sues Florida Healthcare Entrepreneur
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250