Adidas and Reebok Bring Multimillion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Pirated Kanye West Designs
Sportswear giants Adidas and Reebok have filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida, accusing almost 200 online retailers of selling counterfeit sneakers and other sportswear, many of which were designed by rapper, producer and fashion designer Kanye West.
November 05, 2018 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
Adidas and affiliate Reebok have filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against 196 online retailers for allegedly flouting counterfeit versions of sportswear by rapper, producer and fashion designer Kanye West.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, doesn't call anyone a gold digger, but does name a long list of defendants over claims they earned “substantial profits” by promoting, selling and distributing fake or “confusingly similar” imitations of trademarked goods.
West is a Chicago rapper who rose to fame with hits like “Gold Digger,” “Heartless,” “No Church in the Wild” and “Jesus Walks.” He is married to reality television star and entrepreneur Kim Kardashian West.
This isn't the first time West's name has been “used” this year.
Following his unexpected political monologue opposite a bemused President Donald Trump in the Oval Office in October, West declared he was distancing himself from politics, claiming, ”I've been used to spread messages I don't believe in.” Before that, he had emerged as an unlikely Trump supporter. West said in that Oval Office meeting that wearing Trump's “ Make America Great Again” hat had made him feel like Superman. But he has since appeared to pledge allegiance to policies championed by former U.S. President Barack Obama.
But just as West stepped out of the political limelight, a new lawsuit by companies sponsoring his sports line focuses on the alleged misuse of the rapper's moniker.
Many of the alleged pirated products include footwear, sportswear and sports equipment, designed by West and sponsored by Adidas and Reebok. They're being sold online on dozens of websites that include West's nickname, “Yeezy,” in their titles.
According to the complaint, the defendants used West's “famous name” and the companies' widely recognized trademarks to “drive internet consumer traffic to their websites,” many of which ”harm” the brand's reputation in South Florida and beyond.
The plaintiffs span four countries, and include Adidas A.G. in Germany, Adidas International Marketing B.V. in the Netherlands, Adidas America Inc. in Oregon, Reebok International Ltd. in England, and Reebok International Ltd. in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks $2 million from each defendant and $100,000 in statutory damages for every ”cybersquatted” domain name. It also requests that all “illegal” websites be shut down.
“Welcome to our online shop where you can enjoy a happy shopping, where you can experience the first-class after-sale service,” reads one defendants' homepage, 2017yeezy.com, which also appears to brandish Adidas' logo.
Another site, Okyeezy.com, sells a range of Adidas sneakers and also claims to have a “strong manufacture plant” and “excellent quality” products.
Some sites, like Buyfakeyeezys.com, are less subtle in name.
The defendants have no assigned attorneys and do not appear to have been served with the lawsuit as of press time.
Plaintiffs lawyers Stephen M. Gaffigan, Virgilio Gigante and T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez of Stephen M. Gaffigan in Fort Lauderdale did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Read the full complaint:
The sale of counterfeit products, according to the complaint, has grown at an “exponential” rate.
“Plaintiffs suffer ongoing daily and sustained violations of their respective trademark rights at the hands of counterfeiters and infringers,” the complaint said.
The plaintiffs' list of registered trademarks date back to 1970 and range from sports gear to laptop covers, sandals and sunglasses. Sneakers endorsed or designed by NBA stars Michael Jordan and James Harden, and soccer legend David Beckham are also among those potentially affected.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250